Bibliographic record
Abstract
Orius Wolff, 1811 Orius Wolff, 1811: iv (original description), type species by monotypy: Salda nigra Wolff, 1811: iv. Orius: PÉRICART (1972): 160 (redescription); HENRY (1988): 18 (catalog); YASUNAGA (1993): 12 (diagnosis); CASSIS & GROSS (1995): 33 (catalog); PÉRICART (1996): 122 (catalog); YASUNAGA (1997): 358 (diagnosis, discussion); HERNÁNDEZ & STONEDAHL (1999): 548 (diagnosis); BU & ZHENG (2001): 185 (diagnosis); YASUNAGA (2001): 287 (diagnosis, note); CARPINTERO (2002): 37 (catalog); AUKEMA et al. (2013): 90 (catalog); YAMADA et al. (2016): 1108 (diagnosis, discussion). Comments. This cosmopolitan genus is currently composed of approximately 90 species (cf. PÉRICART 1996, YAMADA et al. 2016). Only three representatives are known to occur in Nepal. However, our recent effort has revealed presence of more than ten unknown species; three of them were confirmed to be undescribed and are documented below. Since WAGNER (1952) the subgeneric classification has been employed for Orius; currently six subgenera are present, namely Dimorphella Reuter, 1884 (= Paraorius Yasunaga & Miyamoto, 1993); Microtrachelia Blöte, 1929; Orius s. str.; Heterorius Wagner, 1952; Trichorius Yasunaga, 1997; and Xylorius Yasunaga, 1997. Nonetheless, this subgeneric classification system is perfectly applicable only to the Palaearctic species. Further comprehensive revision on a global basis is required to establish more definitive subgeneric classification (YAMADA et al. 2016). Now twenty species are known from South Asia as listed below; the subgeneric position of five species is yet to be determined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".