MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912702229 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6209891

Procladius (Holotanypus) denticulatus Sublette

2010· article· en· W6912702229 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFishingBuoyGeorge (robot)Beaver

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Procladius (Holotanypus) denticulatus Sublette (Fig. 6 A, B; 7; 12 E, K; 13 D;14 C, G, L) Procladius denticulatus Sublette, 1964a (in part): 124. Procladius (Procladius) denticulatus Sublette; Roback, 1971: 189; Roback 1980: 47; Saether 1977: 48. Material examined. CANADA: Manitoba, Lake Winnipeg, 0.5 km off George Island, 203 males, 11& 12.vii. 1969; 3 km off Grand Rapids, 24 males, 13.vii. 1969; 10 km off (Sturgeonskin point) Long Point, 73 males, 14.vii. 1969; 3 km off McCreary Island, 14 males, 15.vii. 1969; Gimli Government Wharf, 8 males, 24.vii. 1969; 3 km off George Island, 320 males, 27.vii. 1969; Grand Rapids Government Wharf, 2 males, 28.vii. 1969; McBeth Harbor, 59 males, 30.vii. 1969; Pine Dock, 1 male, 31.vii. 1969; Hnausa Government Wharf, 1 male, 8.ix. 1969; Gimli Government Wharf, 4 males, 9.ix. 1969; Old Fishing Dock, 2 males, 16.vi. & 21.vii. 1969; emergence traps: Beaver Creek, 5 males, 9.vi. –14.vii. 1971; rearings: 10 km east southeast of Pearson Reef, 1 male, 5.vi. 1969; 24 km south-southeast of Long Point, 1 male, 10.vi. 1969; east-southeast of outer buoy Red River, 1 male, 9.vi. 1969; Saskatchewan River Buoy, 1 male, 13.vii. 1969; 35 km east-northeast of Sturgeon, 1 female, 14.vii. 1969; Outer buoy of Red River, 1 female, 17.iii. 1970; north of outer buoy Red River, 1 male, 17.iii. 1970; 12 km east-northeast of Winnipeg Beach, 1 male, 17.iii. 1969; South Basin, 148 larvae, 4.vi–31.x.1969; Narrows, 54 larvae, 4.vi– 31.x.1969; North Basin, 226 larvae, 4.vi–31.x.1969. The males all conform to the description given by Roback (1971: 189). The gonostylus (Fig. 6 B, C) varies between resembling mostly the Minnesota population (Roback 1971, fig. 370) and resembling the Québec population (Roback 1971, fig. 372). The females have 0–5 setae on anepisternum II, segment X with about 56–58 setae, and 9–14 sensilla chaetica proximally on each ta1 of p2 and p3. Pupa (n = 10) Cephalothorax. Thoracic horn (Fig. 12 E) 393–577, 469 µm long; 120–188, 146 µm wide; atrial wall of thoracic horn with reticulate pattern; plastron plate diameter 90–188, 135 µm; apical constriction of horn chamber 42– 94, 70 µm wide; length/width of horn 2.60–13.73, 13.26; width of plastron plate /width of horn 0.71–1.03, 0.90; width of plastron plate/width of constriction 1.64–2.14, 1.95. Abdomen. Spinules on T IV relatively large, not grouped (Fig. 12 M). Anal lobe (Fig. 12 K) with 24–32, 28 spines on outer margin; sparse row of long spines posterolaterally; spines at apex either on distinct protuberance or enlarged. Fourth instar larva (n = 10, except when otherwise stated) Head capsule length 860–1060, 949 µm (356)[790–1050µm in Moore & Moore (1978)]. Head. Antennal apex as in Fig.13 D. Lengths of antennal segments 1–5 (µm): 194–220, 211; 24–27, 25; 7–10, 8; 3–4, 4; 2–3, 2. AR 5.11–6.11, 5.60)[5.4–7.5 in Moore & Moore (1978)]. Basal antennal segment 32–41, 39 µm wide; 5.10–6.44, 5.50 times as long as wide; ring organ 0.66–0.80, 0.73 from base; blade 34–42, 38 µm; accessory blade 26–30, 29 µm long. Apical style of second segment 6–9, 8 µm long. Mandible 200–232, 217 µm long [175– 225 µm in Moore & Moore (1978), 167–200 µm in Roback (1980)]. Maxilla (Fig. 14 C) with lamelles of palpifer and some lamelles of galea divided. Maxillary palp (Fig. 14 G) 55–74, 62 µm long; 19–23, 21 µm wide; 2.70–3.52, 2.96 times as long as wide. Length of basal antennal segment/length of palp 2.92–3.93, 3.40. Hypopharyngeal pecten with 11–13, 13 teeth. Abdomen. Claws of posterior parapods (Fig. 14 L) all relatively long and slender. Distribution and ecology. The species was previously known from Sweden (?, Roback 1971: 189), and is widespread Nearctic (Oliver et al. 1990: 15, Spies 1999, Caldwell 2009). Procladius signatus (Zetterstedt), which according to Roback (1971: 189) may be a senior synonym is present in Northern Europe and on the New Siberian Islands. The pupa as illustrated by Langton (1991 plate 7f) is very similar to pupa described here. The species apparently is a northern lake form. The distribution in Lake Winnipeg is shown in Fig. 1, the emergence pattern in Fig. 7.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMarine and fisheries research→French-language works237,207→