Quedius (Raphirus) pseudonymos, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quedius (Raphirus) pseudonymos sp. nov. (Figs. 27, 101, 104 in Smetana 1995) Quedius (Raphirus) maculiventris SMETANA, 1995: 68 [misidentification, nec Quedius (Raphirus) maculiventris BERNHAUER, 1934: 12) Type locality. Taiwan: Taichung Hsien, Hsuehshan, Chi-ka, 2463 m. Type material. Holotype (male) Taiwan: TAIWAN Taichung Hsien, Hsuehshan Chi-ka 2463 m 6.V.91 A. Smetana [T 67] / Quedius maculiventris Bernhauer Det. A. Smetana 1993]. Allotype (female) Taiwan: TAIWAN Chiai Hsien, Alishan, Sister Ponds 2180 m 26. IV. 1990 A. Smetana [T 24] / Quedius maculiventris Bernhauer Det. A. Smetana 1993]. Holotype and allotype in the Smetana collection, Ottawa, Canada, to be eventually deposited at the Muséum d’histoire naturelle, Genève, Switzerland. Paratypes: remaining 58 specimens from localities listed in SMETANA, 1995: 70, deposited in collections listed ibidem. Description. Refer to the description in Smetana 1995: 68–69, and figures 102–107. Geographical distribution. Quedius pseudonymos is endemic to Taiwan. It is at present known from the following Hsiens: Chiai, Hualien, Ilan, Kaohsiung and Taichung. Bionomics. Quedius pseudonymos occurs in forest habitats at middle mountainous elevations, from about 2100 m to 2500 m. Specimens were collected in mixed coniferous (Chamaecyparis) and broadleaved forests in wet moss, and by sifting various forest floor debris, particularly under dense growths of ferns (Smetana 1995: 70). Recognition and comments. Quedius pseudonymos is in all characters quite similar to Q. maculiventris and differs mainly by the different shape of the aedoeagus, particularly by the shape of the median lobe which is dilated anteriorly before narrowed into apical portion (Fig. 104 in Smetana, 1995). Male sternite 8 has five long setae on each side, compared to three or four in Q. maculiventris (Figs. 17, and 101 in Smetana 1995). Externally, the average size of Q. pseudonymos is slightly smaller than that of Q. maculiventris, and the lateral patches of pale hairs on the abdominal tergites are less distinct. Etymology. The specific epithet is the Greek word ψευδωνυμος (falsely called, under false name) in apposition. It refers to the original misinterpretation of the species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".