MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912718670 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6950073

Aspicera gemmae Ros-Farre & Pujade-Villar 2013, n. sp.

2013· article· en· W6912718670 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaSimple eye in invertebratesTuftGemmaScutellumApex (geometry)Wing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aspicera gemmae Ros-Farré & Pujade-Villar n. sp. (Figs 11a & b) Type material: (1♂). HOLOTYPE male (CNCI) 17/VII/1988, BC, Anahim Lake to Redstone, 1000 to 1500 m, CANADA, S & J Peck, car netting pine sand land. Diagnosis. Aspicera gemmae has sharp and dense punctuation on scutum, lacks median mesoscutal carina, and scutellar foveae are clearly striate. This species is similar to A. carlestolrai, but in A. gemmae scutellar foveae are carinate only near interfoveal carina and scutellar spine is wide, while in A. carlestolrai scutellar foveae are completely carinate and scutellar spine is thin. Description Length. Male 3.7 mm.; female unknown. Coloration. Head, mesosoma, metasoma and antenna black. Coxa and trocanter black, remaining leg segments medium brown. Wing veins medium brown. Head. Frons coriaceous, slightly striate longitudinally. Lateral frontal carinae sharp, curved with small teeth, area between lateral frontal carinae and compound eye coriaceous. Gena in lateral view rounded, expanded, coriaceous, with many transverse carinae. Vertex not incised, coriaceous, punctate. Ocelli weakly prominent. Occiput coriaceous, with some weak longitudinal rugae behind ocelli and near lateral margins, behind compound eye. Antenna. Filiform. F1 clearly excavated. Antennal formula: 5(4): 2(2.5): 7(2): 5(2): 5(2): 5(2.5): 5(3): 4.5(2.5): 4.5(2.5): 4.5(2): 4.5(2): 4.5(2): 4(2): 7(2). Mesosoma. Lateral surface of pronotum coriaceous. Subpronotal plate not projected, dorsal margin pubescent. Scutum coriaceous, punctuations small and dense, distance between them smaller than their diameter. Lateral line incomplete, only present on basal 2/3, antero-admedian lines very weak, reaching 1/3–1/2 scutum length, parallel. Medial mesoscutal line present only between antero-admedian lines, very weak. Notauli and median mesoscutal furrow very weakly striate transversely. Area between notauli not prominent in lateral view. Parascutal sulcus narrow, ending in front of tegula, smooth, with some scattered setae. Mesopleuron carinate and coriaceous on anterior 1/3, smooth posteriorly. Scutellum 0.9 times scutum length, sharply emarginate. Scutellar foveae deep, shiny, sharply carinate near interfoveal carina, scutellar pits absent. Interfoveal carina and longitudinal carinae inside foveae continuing along scutellar disc until end of scutellar spine. Scutellar disc flat, coriaceous, with longitudinal carinae and weakly rugose, straight and sloping towards end of scutellar spine in lateral view. Scutellar spine wide, short, 0.32 times length of scutellar disc, coriaceous, longitudinally carinate, triangle-shaped, rather blunt, directed downwards in lateral view. Wing. Wing membrane slightly brownish. Radial cell 2.11 times longer than wide. Wing pubescence reduced. Marginal pubescence present basally. R1 very short. R2 straight, slightly curved near dorsal margin. Rs+M marked by a shadow. Derivatio nominis. Dedicated to Gemma Pujade i Vilageliu, daughter of the second author. Biology. Unknown. Distribution. Nearctic: Canada (British Columbia).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207