Pegomya circumpolaris Ackland & Griffiths 1983
Bibliographic record
Abstract
4. Pegomya circumpolaris Ackland & Griffiths, 1983 (Figs 15, 24‒27, 66, 67) Pegomya (Phoraea) circumpolaris Ackland & Griffiths in Griffiths, 1983: 229, figs 316, 318, 323. Pegomya circumpolaris Ackland & Griffiths; Ackland 1989: 228, figs 46‒51; Michelsen 2006b: 111. Description. Size. Wing length up to 5.5mm. Male. Distinguished from the very similar P. f u r va by a few rather subtle differences: Mid and hind femora on extreme basal parts distinctly yellow. Hind femur on basal third with a row of fine setulae standing out from the surrounding ground setulae. Hind tibia with apical av seta longer than submedian av seta. Left side of pregenital sclerite with a glossy area devoid of dusting. Terminalia (Figs 15, 24‒27) differ most significantly by larger sternite V with stronger lateral setae, surstylus broader in lateral view, and pregonite differently shaped on distal part. Female. Difficult to separate from the female of P. f ur v a, but it seems that females with lower half of frontal vitta extensively orange yellow and apical av seta on hind tibia strong and at least as long as submedian av seta may be safely referred to the present species. Oviscapt (Figs 66, 67) very short, considerably shorter than combined length of tergites III‒V, in other respects very similar to that of P. fulgens and P. transgressa. Material examined. [FMNH, MZLU, ZMUC, ZMUT]. FINLAND: Nylandia: Harakka, 1♀ 26.ix.1951. Ostrobottnia kajanensis: Suomussalmi, 1♀ (O. Sorsakoski). Lapponia enontekiensis: Malla, 1♀ 17.viii.1970 (L. Tiensuu); Saana, 1♂, 1♀ 15.viii.1970 (L. Tiensuu). NORWAY: Sør-Trøndelag: Kongsvoll, 900‒1100m, 1♂, 1♀ 20‒28.vii.1983 (V. Michelsen). Nordland: Røst, 1♂ 9.vii.1936 (T. Soot-Ryen). Finnmark: Bosekop, 1♂ 29.vi.1924 (T. Soot-Ryen); Faestningstuen, 1♂, 2♀ 1‒4.viii.1924 (T. Soot-Ryen); Jotkajavre, 1♂, 1♀ 18.viii.1924 (T. Soot- Ryen); Ravnastuen, 1♂, 1♀ 11.viii.1924 (T. Soot-Ryen). RUSSIA: Murmansk: Monchegorsk. RUSSIA: Karelia: Petrozavodsk, 1♀ (A. Günther). SWEDEN: Småland: Eriksmåla, 1♂ 21.vii‒2.viii.1985 (V. Michelsen). Jämtland: Åre, 1♂ 11.viii.1946 (O. Ringdahl). Norrbotten: Utmockan, Kengis, 1♂ 7.vii.1951 (Ander et al.). Lule Lappmark: Dundret, 600m, 1♂ 7.vii.1960 (P. Ardö); Kåbdejaure, 634m, 1♂ 12.vii.1960 (Brinck et al.). Torne Lappmark: Abisko, 4♂, 1♀ 1‒17.viii.1951 (J.R. Vockeroth), 2♀ 15.viii.1958 (P.I. Persson), 4♂ 13.vii‒8.viii.1974 (B.G. Svensson); Jebrenjokk, 1♂ 24.vii.1918, 1♂ 10.vii.1922 (O. Ringdahl); Kaisepakte, 1♂, 6♀ 9.viii.1958 (P.I. Persson); Nuolja, 1♂ 9.vii.1918 (O. Ringdahl), at 900m, 1♂ 10.vii.1974 (B.G. Svensson); Paittasjärvi, 1♂ 3.vii.1961 (Brinck et al.); Vassijaure, 1♂ 14.vii.1918 (O. Ringdahl). Distribution. PALEARCTIC. Britain: Scotland (Ackland 1989); Norway; Sweden; Finland; Russia: Murmansk, Karelia. NEARCTIC. USA: Alaska (Griffiths 1983); Canada: British Columbia, Quebec, Yukon (Griffiths 1983); Greenland (Griffiths 1983; Michelsen 2006b). Biology. See under P. f urva.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".