Macrosteles sordidipennis Stal 1858
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Macrosteles sordidipennis (Stål, 1858), new record (Plate 11, figs. 9–17) Thamnotettix sordidipennis Stål, 1858: 194 Cicadula sexnotata salina Reuter, 1886: 211 Macrosteles (Macrosteles) salina (Reuter); Beirne, 1952: 221 Macrosteles sordidipennis, Ossiannilsson, 1983: 641, Figs. 2048 – 2050 Length (including tegmen). Male: 3.1–3.4 mm; female: 3.2–3.5 mm. Greenish yellow, head with the midline and near posterior margin yellowish. Vertex, pronotum and scutellum marked with black spots, sometimes merged with variation in head pattern. Male abdomen. 2nd acrotergite with trunk very thick; neck stout. 2nd tergal apodeme reaching to middle of tergite posteriorly. 1st sternal apodeme with anterior lobes elongately produced, narrowed apically; posterior lobes reduced. 2nd sternal apodeme with posterior lobes 2.5 times as long as wide. Male genitalia. Aedeagal shaft smooth, slim, apical appendages straight, often crossed, or convergent apically. Material examined. CHINA? 20 males, 20 females, Hebei Prov., Weichang County, Jiangjiadian County, 12.viii.2006, Coll. Duan Yani; 2 males, 6 females, Shandong Prov., Yantai City, Mt. Kunyu, 11~ 12.vii.2001, Coll. Qin Daozheng & Liu Zhenjiang (trapped); 2 males, Qinghai Prov., Dulan County, 31.viii.1950, Coll. Lu Baolin (CAU); 4 males, 3 females, Xinjiang Autonomous Region, Qinghe County, 9.viii.2006, Coll. Dai Wu & Li Tao (all NWAFU, except where indicated). Distribution. Holarctic, from Europe to western Canada, south to Mongolia (Kwon 1988) and China (Hebei, Shandong, Qinghai, Xinjiang).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".