Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key to worldwide Parandrini genera (excluding African Birandra gabonica (Thomson, 1858), B. capicola (Thomson, 1860), and B. morettoi (Adlbauer, 2004)). 1. Procoxal cavities closed behind.................................................................................................... 2 — Procoxal cavities opened behind.................................................................................................. 5 2(1). Paronychium absent.................................................................................................................... 3 — Paronychium present.................................................................................................................. 4 3(2). Elytra with short and distinct hair. Africa intertropical, Madagascar and Vietnam (introduced)...................................................................................................... Stenandra Lameere, 1912 — Elytra glabrous. Canada, United States, England (introduced), Germany (introduced)........................................................................................................................ Neandra Lameere, 1912 4(2). Galea short, reaching only apex of first segment of maxillary palp; dorsal sensorial area of antennomere XI present and divided by carina. Asia (Iran, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan)............................................................................................................... Archandra Lameere, 1912 — Galea long, reaching or surpassing middle of second segment of maxillary palp; dorsal sensorial area of antennomere XI absent, carina lacking. America (between latitude 42 oN and 40 oS, including West Indies), England (introduced)............................... Parandra Latreille, 1802 5(1). Mandible without small tooth at apex of latero-outer face or vaguely indicated (Fig. 75, 76).... 6 — Mandible with distinct small tooth at apex of latero-outer face (Fig. 77-117)............................ 7 6(5). Galea (Fig. 199) short; apex of prosternal process enlarged; procoxal cavities slightly opened behind. Hawaiian Islands........... Hawaiiandra Santos-Silva, Heffern and Matsuda, gen. nov. — Galea (Fig. 202) long; apex of prosternal process narrow; procoxal cavities clearly opened behind. Australia........................... Storeyandra Santos-Silva, Heffern and Matsuda, gen. nov. 7(5). Latero-outer face of mandibles with tooth near middle (Fig. 77-79); inner face with strong and successive transverse keels (Fig. 361). Indonesia (Sulawesi?, Halmahera and Irian Jaya), Papua New Guinea..................... Malukandra Santos-Silva, Heffern and Matsuda, gen. nov. — Latero-outer face of mandibles without tooth near middle (Fig. 75, 76, 80-117); inner face smooth.................................................................................................................................................. 8 8(7). Presence of deep depression in “V” on dorsal face of head (Fig. 370, 372, 373, 375); dorsal carina of mandibles (mainly in males), short, strongly oblique in relation to the longitudinal axis, and fused at apex to the more basal tooth of the inner margin (Fig. 130, 132). New Caledonia............................................ Caledonandra Santos-Silva, Heffern and Matsuda, gen. nov. — Depression in “V” on dorsal face of head absent (Fig. 410, 412); dorsal carina of mandibles not strongly oblique in relation to the longitudinal axis, and not reaching the inner margin (Fig. 144, 156)................................................................................................................................... 9 9(8). Mandibles (Fig. 120) tumid at latero-outer face. South America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, French Guiana).................................................................... Acutandra Santos-Silva, 2002 — Mandibles (Fig. 134, 141) not tumid at latero-outer face.......................................................... 10 10(9). Mandibles of male (Fig. 136, 118) with largest width of latero-outer face equal to, at most, 1/3 of length; in female equal to, at most, half the length............................................................... 11 — Mandibles of male (Fig. 148, 158) with largest width of latero-outer face clearly larger than 1/3 of length; in female larger than the half the length.................................................................. 12 11(10). Dorsal surface of head with gibbosities between eyes; mandibles of male (Fig. 134, 136) relatively narrow at base in dorsal view (width from less than half the length to slightly larger than half), except in M. bougainvillensis (Fig. 138). Fiji Is. (Viti Levu; Vanau Levu, Ovalau), Solomon Is. (Santa Ana and Santa Isabel Islands), Papua New Guinea (Bougainville Island).......................................................... Melanesiandra Santos-Silva, Heffern and Matsuda, gen. nov. — Dorsal surface of head without gibbosities between eyes (sometimes, indicated in female); mandibles of male (Fig. 118) distinctly wide at base in dorsal view (width distinctly greater than half of length). Mexico and West Indies to 20 oS latitude.................... Birandra Santos-Silva, 2002 12(10). Margins of latero-basal third of prothorax slightly convergent; veins MP 3 and MP 4 (Fig. 210) not fused at apices. Indonesia (Irian Jaya), Papua New Guinea (New Guinea Island and Normamby Island), Australia (Norfolk Island)......................................................................................................................................... Papuandra Santos-Silva, Heffern and Matsuda, gen. nov. — Margins of latero-basal third of prothorax clearly convergent; veins MP 3 and MP 4 (Fig. 211) fused at apices. Japan (Ryukyu Islands), Taiwan, Philippines, Malaysia (Borneo), Indonesia (Borneo, Sulawesi, Java, Moluccas, Irian Jaya, Sumatra, Lombok, Ambon), Papua New Guinea................................................... Komiyandra Santos-Silva, Heffern and Matsuda, gen. nov.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.048 | 0.023 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".