MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912884634 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7398945

Chortoglyphus arcuatus

2022· article· en· W6912884634 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDate Palm Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoppyShrimpSugar beetCaneCropSugar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chortoglyphus arcuatus (Troupeau, 1879) Distribution in Iran – West Azerbaijan Province: Region not mentioned, Mazandaran Province: Region not mentioned (Esmaili 1983; Faraji 1993b; Mirfakhraii 1994), Razavi Khorasan Province: Mashhad (Khaleghabadian et al. 2012), Guilan Province: Masal, Sowme'eh Sara, Rezvanshahr, Rice Research Institute of Iran, Anzali, Kuchesfahan, Fuman (Noei 2007; Noei and Ostovan 2012). General distribution – Barbados, Belgium, Canada, China, Croatia, Czech Republic, Egypt, England, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, Taiwan, Thailand, Wales (Hagstrum et al. 2013). Collection place(s) – Houses, rice barley, barley sweeping, bean curd, cereal, Chinese medicine, clover seed (red), dried fruit, dried vegetable, grain, grass seed, hay, herb, lentil, maize, malt, millet, mushroom, oat, poppy seed, potato flour, poultry mix, residue, rice, rice (husked), rye, shrimp (dried), soya sweeping, squid (dried), sugar beet seed, sweeping, sweetpotato chip (dried), wheat, wheat flour, wheat flour sweeping, stored rice, rice dust and debris (Esmaili 1983; Faraji 1993b; Mirfakhraii 1994; Modarres Awal 1994; Noei 2007; Noei and Ostovan 2012; Hagstrum et al. 2013).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0630.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDate Palm Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207