Erebaces woodruffi Anderson 2022, new species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Erebaces woodruffi Anderson, new species (Fig. 1–2) Specimen examined. Holotype female; Philippines, Palawan, Roxas. Magara, June 2019, Ismael Lumawig via local collectors (CMNC). Description. Holotype female, length 12.3 mm, width 6.4 mm. As for E. kidapawanus except as follows: Integument black throughout. Rounded pale-yellow scales on pronotal disc forming two broad lines that converge anteriorly from latero-basal angle to apex, in form of an inverted “V”, these lines of scales extended onto elytral humeri and posteriorly along interstria 7 to about mid-length of elytra. Elytra with humeri prominent, angulate, glossy at tip and with row of small glossy tubercles extended from base to widest point. Elytral interstriae with elongate tubercles covered with shiny granules on interstriae 3 and 5, those on interstria 3 low, at about basal one-third of elytral length and the second one, much taller and pointed posteriorly, at apex of declivity, those on interstria 5 low, at about midlength and a second at apex of declivity adjacent to taller one on interstria 3; interval 7 with elongate tuberculate prominence just behind humeri. The holotype female was not dissected. Etymology. The new species is named after Robert E. Woodruff (1933–2021) of Gainesville, Florida in recognition of his interest in Philippine insects. Diagnosis. Aside from the obvious difference in the pattern of the pale scales on the pronotum and elytra there are some more subtle differences between the two species. The humeri in E. kidapawanus are marked by a strongly laterally protruding single glossy tubercle whereas in E. woodruffi the humeri are marked by a short series of smaller glossy tubercles that end in a slightly larger glossy tubercle at the widest point. This largest tubercle is not as strongly laterally protruding as in E. kidapawanus. The largest elytral tubercle, located at the apex of the declivity on interstria 3 is more rounded and directed more dorsally in E. kidapawanus but has more of a pointed apex and is directed more posteriorly in E. woodruffi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.203 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".