Aleochara (Xenochara) castaneipennis Mannerheim
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aleochara (Xenochara) castaneipennis Mannerheim (Fig. 10 b, 11–19) Aleochara castaneipennis Mannerheim, 1843. Klimaszewski 1984, Klimaszewski and Peck 1986 (misidentification of A. castaneimarmotae), Lohse et al. 1990, Klimaszewski and Winchester 2002, Gouix and Klimaszewski 2007, Klimaszewski et al. 2005, Majka and Klimaszewski 2010, Majka et al. 2011, Klimaszewski et al. 2011. Diagnosis. This species may be distinguished by the following combination of characters: body subparallel, length 2.8–6.5 mm; brown to dark brown, with tarsi and palps rusty-brown, elytra often paler than remainder of body (Fig. 11); meshed microsculpture of forebody strong but broken or absent in many places (Fig. 12); antennomers V–X strongly transverse (Fig. 11). Male: tergite VIII truncate and slightly emarginate apically (Fig. 15); sternite VIII strongly triangularly produced apically (Fig. 16); median lobe of aedeagus with tubus evenly arcuate in lateral view (Fig. 13), apex of tubus bent ventrad, subapical sclerites of internal sac with apex upturned but not hooked or sinuate (Fig. 10 b); median lobe in dorsal view as illustrated (Fig. 14). Female: tergite VIII truncate apically and shallowly emarginate medially (Fig. 17); sternite VIII rounded apically with short apical pubescence (Fig. 18); spermatheca L-shaped, capsule slightly elongate sac-shaped (Fig. 19). This species is often misidentified as the externally similar A. fumata, from which it differs by having slightly coarser pronotal punctation, interstices between punctures less glossy, body often larger and different genital features. It may also be confused with the western North American species A. quadrata Sharp, from which it can be distinguished by the distinctly paler disc of the pronotum compared to the head, evenly arcuate apical half of the tubus and subapical sclerite of the internal sac upturned at apex. For a comparison with its sibling species, A. castaneimarmotae, see above. Distribution (verified localities). Origin: Nearctic. Canada: AB, BC, LB, NB, NF, NS, NT, ON, QC, YT. USA: AK, AZ, CO, WA, WY. Based on a re-examination of the material originally examined by Klimaszewski (1984) and new material available to us, we state above only those records which can be confirmed here. Many of the state records south of the northeastern U.S. may refer to A. castaneimarmotae, but this needs to be confirmed. All specimens from Oregon and the available males from California listed by Klimaszewski (1984) refer to A. quadrata. All 134 specimens re-examined from Alaska (UAM), and identified by one of us (JK) as A. castaneipennis, are correctly identified. Collection and habitat data. Habitat: coniferous, deciduous and mixedwood forest types, coastal limestone barrens. Adults often found in rotting mushrooms, carrion, forest leaf litter, moss, and human feces. In NB, this species was often abundant in decaying mushrooms but was seldom found in other microhabitats. Collecting period: IV–XI. Collecting method: sifting decaying mushrooms, forest litter, using unbaited and carrion-baited pitfall traps, flight intercept traps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".