MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6913030075 · doi:10.5284/1091656

Leicester's Gatehouse, Kenilworth Castle, Kenilworth, Warwickshire : Tree-Ring Analysis of Timbers

2007· article· en· W6913030075 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Architecture and Urbanism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)CarpentryRoof

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Samples were obtained from 115 different timbers in the Gatehouse proper and Colonel Hawksworth's House at Leicester's Gatehouse, Kenilworth Castle. Of these 115, 91 were measured, 24 having too few rings. Of the 91, 62 can be combined into one of 12 site chronologies, seven of which, representing 49 samples, are dated. A further single sample is dated individually. Five site chronologies, representing 13 samples, and 28 measured ungrouped samples are undated. The Gatehouse proper contains a number of timbers which were probably felled in the third quarter of the sixteenth century, a period coinciding with its construction by Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester. The Gatehouse was later re-roofed with timber felled in AD 1740-60. Whilst Colonel Hawksworth's House contains a small amount of sixteenth- century material, the majority of dated timbers appear to have been felled in the later-fourteenth century. This includes timbers from partition walls, the newel posts of the staircase, some of timbers in the roof space, and possibly some oak panels, these last being of Continental origin. Most of these timbers are re-used. A number of other timbers remain undated. Most notably perhaps are those of the stairs in the south-west turret of the Gatehouse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical Architecture and UrbanismFrench-language works237,207