Bibliographic record
Abstract
Homalocnemis praesumpta Collin, 1933 (Figs 13–27, 28) Homalocnemis praesumpta Collin, 1933: 31, figs. 6b, c. Type-locality: Ancud, Chiloé Is., Chile. Syntypes. Four males, one female (NHMUK); one male (OUMNH). See Pont (1995: 135) for label details. Distribution. Chile: Región de La Araucanía: Malleco Province (Termas de Tolhuaca, Sierra de Nahuelbuta); Región de Los Lagos: Osorno Province (PN Puyehue, Termas Aguas Calientes), Llanquihue Province (Ensenada, Puerto Varas); Chiloé Province (Ancud, Chiloé I.) (Fig. 28). References. Stuardo, 1946: 104 (cat.); Smith, 1967: 9 (cat.); Chvála, 1991: 13 (com.); Pont, 1995: 135 (typ.); Yang et al., 2007: 280 (cat.). Diagnosis. In addition to features in the key, this species is distinguished by the absence of a digitiform epandrial process, male cerci fused to surstylus posterolaterally and female sternite 8 greatly enlarged, and apex deeply bilobed. Redescription. Wing length: 4.4–6.1 mm. Male (Figs 13–21). Predominantly black with mesopleuron and coxae gray pruinose (Fig. 13). Front of scutum entirely dull black; prescutellar depression with broad, rectangular pruinose patch. Palpus with long blackish setae (Fig. 14). Wing infuscate, anal lobe weakly developed (Fig. 15). Vein R 2+3 gently upcurved distally, ending after level of branching of vein R 4+5. Section between veins R 2+3 and R 4 shorter than section between veins R 4 and R 5 (Fig. 15). Hind tarsomere 1 not swollen. Tergite 8 half-length of respective sternite (Figs 16, 17), narrowed medially; sternite 8 with desclerotized or depigmented medial area (Fig. 17); remaining pregenital sclerites unmodified. Terminalia highly sclerotized. Epandrial lamellae broadly quadrate, somewhat inflated, fused narrowly along dorsal bridge; without subapical process (Fig. 18). Cercus laminar, narrowly tapered anteriorly; broadly fused to surstylus posterolaterally (Fig. 18). Hypoproct membranous, clothed in minute setulae (Fig. 18). Subepandrial sclerite broadly V-shaped, extending as bacilliform sclerites to surstylus; surstylus fused broadly with epandrium (Fig. 18). Hypandrium with gonocoxal apodeme well developed, expanded horizontally; gonocoxal apodemes united dorsally by upright phallic plate (Fig. 19); phallic plate tapered dorsally to base of subepandrial sclerite, opposite dorsal bridge of epandrial lamellae. Postgonites fused dorsally across hypandrium into elongate, upright digitiform process, rod-shaped with rounded apex (Fig. 19). Apex of hypandrium articulated with phallus (Fig. 19). Phallus with paired, short, acute lateral projections and deeply forked apex (Fig. 20). Ejaculatory apodeme slender, elongate, positioned within hypandrium, separated from base of phallus (Figs 19, 21). Female (Figs 22–27). Same pattern of color as male (Fig. 22). Sternite 8 paired, narrowly connected ventrally (Fig. 24), enlarged basally, elongate, posteroventrally directed into projecting lobes; clothed in distinct apical setae (Fig. 23). Syntergite 9+10 absent. Sternite 10 (Figs 25, 26) triangular in dorsal view, with narrow, darkly pigmented anterior margin; dark band loosely connected or separated from pair of thinly sclerotized medial plates. Genital fork not observed, probably not sclerotized. Cercus ovoid (Figs 24–26). Spermatheca well sclerotized, subspherical (Fig. 27). Material examined. CHILE. Región de La Araucanía: Province Malleco, Termas de Tolhuaca [38°14′06″S – 71°43′58″W], 1989, L. Peña (1♁, CNC); Región de Los Lagos: Prov. Osorno, Parque Nacional Puyehue, Termas Aguas Calientes, 40°44′S – 72°19′W, 440 m, 14–31.i.2017, sweeping, V.C. Silva & D.S. Amorim (1♁, MZUSP; 1♁, INPA); Prov. Llanquihue, Volcán Osorno, 322 m, 41°10′09″S – 72°30′51″W, 8.ii.2011, sweeping, D.S. Amorim (1♁, 1♀, MNNC; 1♁, 1♀, INPA); [Province Malleco], Sierra de Nahuelbuta, W. of Angol, 1200 m, 3.i.1951, leg. Ross & Michelbacher (1♀, CAS) [37°49′40″S – 72°59′27″W]; [Province Llanquihue], 8 miles W. of Puerto Varas, 16.i.1951, leg. Ross & Michelbacher (1♀, CAS) [41°19′27″S – 73°08′41″W].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".