Standing Tall: Hommages à Csaba Varga / ed. Bjarne Melkevik (Budapest: Pázmány Press 2012) 487 [Xenia] [ISBN 9789633089733 / ISSN 2061-9227]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thirty-five papers by outstanding specialists of philosophy of law and comparative law from Western Europe, Central Europe, Eastern Europe, as well as from Northern America and Japan, dedicated to the Hungarian philosopher of law and comparatist Csaba Varga Bjarne Melkevik Standing Tall: Hommages à Dr. Csaba Varga Roberto Andorno (Zürich) Intergovernmental Declarations Relating to Bioethics: Are they Legal in Nature or Merely Ethical? Marie-Eve Arbour (Québec, Laval) The Role of Comparatists within EU’s Private Law Making Process Stéphane Bauzon (Roma, Tor Vergata) Brain Death vs. Heart Death André Bélanger (Québec, Laval) From the Reification to the Re-humanization of the Contractual Bond? Jes Bjarup (Stockholm) The Concept of Validity: Some Remarks on the Theories of Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Alf Ross Jan M. Broekman (Pennsylvania, PennState) Moore’s Law and Law William Conklin (Windsor, Ontario) Lon Fuller’s Legal Structuralism Paulo Ferreira da Cunha (Porto) Natural Law & Fraternal Law Francesco d’Agostino (Roma, Tor Vergata) Natural Law, Positive Law, and the New Provocations of Bioethics Michael Fischer (Salzburg) The Cultural Context of Illness, Death and Transplantation Andreas Funke (Köln) Felix Somló’s Legal Philosophy: Content, Critique, Counterparts H. Patrick Glenn (Montreal) On the Origins of Peoples and of Laws Sercan Gürler (Istanbul) The Problem of Legal Indeterminacy in Contemporary Legal Philosophy and Lawrence Solum’s Approach to the Problem Yasemin Işıktaç (Istanbul) The Meaning of the Law: Limits and Possibilities Bernard S. Jackson (Manchester) Some Preliminary Observations on Truth and Argumentation in the Jewish Legal Tradition Zdeněk Kühn (Praha) Formalism and Anti-Formalism in Judicial Reasoning Maurizio Manzin (Trento) »Ordo civitatis«: The Birth of the City and the Urbanization of the Philosophical Landscape Bjarne Melkevik (Québec, Laval) Poetry as Resilience: Engaging Silence and Indifference Françoise Michaut (Paris, CNRS) Deconstruction as a Tool in American Legal Theory and Jurisprudence Assya Ostroukh (Krasnodar, Kuban) Legal Philosophy in Russia Mehmet Tevfik Ozcan (Istanbul) Capitalism and the Rule of Law: The Three Stages of Legal Order in Modern Society Hayrettin Ökçesiz (Antalya, Akdeniz) Sovereignty in a Seven-Trigeminus Construct Legal Culture Diagram Within the Frame of »Nomos–Physis« (Society–Culture–Nature) Peter Th. Ørebech (Tromsö) The <em>Rebus sic stantibus</em> through the Lenses of the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros and the <em>Questech Cases</em> Laura Palazzani (Roma, LUMSA) Biolaw and Ethical Pluralism Enrico Pattaro (Bologna) <em>Jus</em>, <em>ratio</em> and <em>lex</em> in some Excerpts of Aquinas Andrey Polyakov & Mikhail Antonov (Saint-Petersburg) Leon Petrazycki’s Legal Theory and Contemporary Problems of Law Sofia Popescu (Bucureşti, Institutul de Cercetări Juridice) Legal Culture: A Key Concept for Research on the European Integration of Law Federico Puppo (Trento) A Classical View on Law and Information Technologies Erich Schweighofer (Wien) Theory of Legal Informatics Alexander Somek (Iowa) Integration without Emancipation: Reflections on »Social Europe« Teruji Suzuki (Japan) Pluralistic Structure of Social Norms in Asia Gülriz Uygur (Ankara) Neutral Principles, Justice and Law Alfonsas Vaišvila (Vilnius, Mykolas Römeris) Human Dignity and the Right to Dignity in Terms of Legal Personalism: From the Conception of Static Dignity to the Conception of Dynamic Dignity Francesco Viola (Palermo) Legal Hermeneutics and Cultural Pluralism Jan Woleński (Kraków) Remarks on Legal Positivism
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.093 | 0.023 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".