MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6913126936 · doi:10.5683/sp2/chdxo0

The Commissariat Building - Bytown Museum (Third floor) - Integrated Project Dossier (2016)

2022· dataset· en· W6913126936 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDoorsGableMasonryDowntownRoofVisitor patternExhibitionGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Commissariat Building is recognized by the Government of Canada as a Classified Federal Heritage Building due to its historical, architectural, and environmental values. Historical value: The Commissariat Building has a strong historic association with the military origin of the area and the development of the Rideau waterway and the city of Ottawa as a whole. At the time of construction, Ottawa was transforming from a small lumber town to the capital of Canada. The large buildings on either side of the museum dwarf it, illustrating that although it has lasted, it is a small building compared to modern size. In addition, the grandness of the surrounding buildings helps to highlight the blandness of the museum, as it was constructed for utility use only. Architectural value: The Bytown Museum is a small post and beam building clad in a masonry exterior. Despite the relatively small size, the building has an imposing presence, with plain and symmetrical facades. The large supply doors on every floor are a functional attribute that contributes to the visual proportioning of the building. The east and south side roof soffits previously contained a pulley system to lift supplies to the doors on every level. There is a high level of craftsmanship visible on the masonry walls, although the gable roof is visibly sloping due to structural instability which has been addressed by Parks Canada. Environmental value: The current location of the Bytown Museum is in the heart of downtown Ottawa, making it a visible and easily accessible connection to Ottawa’s history. The building also reinforces the historic military character of its environment, which includes the locks and the lockmaster’s building. Its visibility from the Ottawa river as well as its accessibility as a historic museum makes it a landmark in the downtown Ottawa area. This is the Integrated Project Dossier compiled by a group of undergraduate students of the Architectural Conservation and Sustainability Program (Engineers and architects) at Carleton University for the CIVE3207 (ARCN4100) Historic Site Recording and Assessment course in 2016. The scope of work focused in recording the third-floor fo this important building.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→