5 Castle Street, Farnham, Surrey. Historic Building Monitoring and Archaeological Monitoring Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In response to a condition placed on the planning permission for development at 5 Castle Street, Farnham, Surrey, the Heritage Network was commissioned by the developer to undertake a programme of building recording and archaeological monitoring of the development groundworks. It was considered that the present investigation had the potential to contribute to an understanding of the development of the building and the origins and development of settlement in the core of the historic town. It was considered that the present investigation had the potential to contribute to an understanding of the development of the building and the origins and development of settlement in the core of the historic town. The building recording, together with the cartographic evidence obtained for the historic building impact assessment (Brook and Kerr 2011) demonstrate that the West Range of the building had undergone a number of alterations from the 1830s onwards. These changes had left their mark in breaks within the brickwork at the western end of both the north and south elevations of Room GF13. Evidence recorded in the test pits in the cellar, in the service pit in Room GF1, and in the service trenches and area of ground reduction outside the building, indicated that the footprint of the building had been terraced into the hill, removing any earlier stratigraphic deposits. No features or deposits pre-dating the house were revealed, suggesting that earlier evidence has either been destroyed or deeply buried by post-medieval activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".