MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6913180368 · doi:10.5683/sp3/y5dlxk

Simulation of groundwater recharge in southern Quebec – method and database

2022· dataset· en· W6913180368 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwater rechargeGroundwaterClimate changeHydrology (agriculture)Christian ministryPeriod (music)Water resourcesScale (ratio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dataset contains all the method and data published by Emmanuel Dubois during his PhD project entitled impact of global changes on groundwater recharge in cold and humid climate, case study in southern Quebec (Canada). This research, carried out under the direction of Prof. Marie Larocque (UQAM), was part of a project aiming at developing new knowledge about the groundwater resources to anticipate the impact of climate change in southern Québec (Canada) and funded by the Québec Ministry of Environment and fight against climate change (MELCC). The study area, comprised of eight river watersheds and located between the St. Lawrence River and the USA-Quebec border (35 800 km2), is a strategic agricultural region with a hydrological dynamic led by cold winters and warm summers. The general objective of the research was to quantify the current and future impact of climate change on regional scale the groundwater recharge (GWR) in cold and humid climates, to better anticipate future conditions. Estimates of GWR were simulated with a 500 m x 500 m resolution and a monthly time step using the HydroBudget model (Dubois et al., 2021b), developed during the project. The model was calibrated over the 1961-2017 period using river flows and baseflows (Dubois et al., 2021a). It was used to simulate GWR over the 1961-2017 period (past) and the 1951-2100 period (scenarios). Each chapter of the thesis corresponds to a published (or submitted) article in a peer review journal. The data associated with each article were made public in individual Dataverse datasets. As well, the code of the HydroBudget model was made public on Dataverse (Dubois et al., 2021b), with an application example and a user guide (Dubois et al., 2021d). Each of these datasets contains detailed metadata, licences, and possible usage restrictions. Users are invited to refer to the individual datasets for more information. Chapter 2 of the thesis presents the article “Simulation of long-term spatiotemporal variations in regional-scale groundwater recharge: contributions of a water budget approach in cold and humid climates” published in the journal Hydrology and Earth Science System in 2021 (Dubois et al., 2021a). The associated GWR simulations over the 1961-2017 period are available here (on the Dataverse platform; Dubois et al., 2021c): https://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/TFNPQF. Chapter 3 of the thesis presents the article “Climate Change Impacts on Groundwater Recharge in Cold and Humid Climates: Controlling Processes and Thresholds” published in the special issue “Application of Climatic Data in Hydrologic Models” of the journal Climate in 2022 (Dubois et al., 2022a). The associated GWR simulations over the 1951-2100 period are available here (on the Dataverse platform; Dubois et al., 2022b): https://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/SWH4O1. Chapter 4 of the thesis presents the article “Impact of land cover changes on long-term and regional-scale groundwater recharge simulation in cold and humid climates” that was submitted for publication in June 2022. The associated GWR simulations over the 1951-2100 period will be available in a new Dataverse dataset as soon as the article is accepted for publication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→