MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6917296047 · doi:10.57611/qts.v2i1.242

Sociology of Structures, Structures of Sociology. An Interview with Charles Crothers

2023· article· en· W6917296047 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Cultural Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChristian ministryWork (physics)Social researchVariety (cybernetics)Field (mathematics)Position (finance)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Charles Crothers is Emeritus Professor of Sociology at Auckland University of Technology (AUT), New Zealand. He was born in Christchurch, NZ, but grew up in small seaside town Tauranga, attending a multi-disciplinary social science degree at the brand-new University of Waikato. He then switched Sociology as a discipline, completed his Ph.D. at Victoria University of Wellington and followed up with several years as a junior lecturer at VUW. A further 5 years with the research section of the “Town and Country Planning Division” at the Ministry of Works and Development followed, providing a very useful platform for policy work and data analysis. He then spent a decade teaching sociology at the University of Auckland and half a decade at the University of Natal, Durban (South Africa), with the final two decades back in Auckland, lecturing at AUT. He now continues as a Senior Research Associate of the Department of Sociology, University of Johannesburg, South Africa. Throughout his career, Crothers has experienced many sabbatical periods around the world: at the University of Oregon, Waterloo Canada, Kent at Canterbury and Sussex, with the most recent at Sapienza-University of Rome in 2022. From this vantage point, mixing NZ’s peculiar perspective and a variety of stays abroad, Crothers’ position in the field of sociology is fairly unique, at least socio-geographically.His career-long interests have lain with the analysis of social structures (and methods for doing so) and, hence, with Robert K. Merton, one of the leading social structural theorists, and finally how Merton’s work was set within that of the Columbia Tradition and more broadly the structuralist-functionalist school. Although these themes have been quite continuous, they have varied by context, such as settler societies and concerning linking theory and methods, as well as the connection of pure and applied sociology. Without a particular mainstream spe-cialty, his focus turned to what might be thought of an empirical version of struc-tural functionalism (“quantitative ethnography”, one could say in Bourdieusian parlance): the examination of social patterns of the social structure, and how these relate to patterns in the cultural structure.Further, his participation in the discipline of Sociology has been important (partly as a good unionist): he has served as President or other executive role in both the NZ Sociology Association and within the International Sociological Association, also editing journals and book series.This interview arose from the topics discussed during two seminars deliv-ered to postgraduate students at the Department of Communication and Social Research at Sapienza-University of Rome (October/November 2022). Two main topics are constantly (although diversely) discussed in the following pages: the sociological analysis of social structures and the particular structures that inform the field of sociology – their preponderance in this interview justifies the some-how Debordian title we have chosen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0190.046
Scholarly communication0.0100.014
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0070.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)Same topicSocial and Cultural DynamicsFrench-language works237,207