MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6920517422 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13535443

Additional file 1 of Ion channel profiling of the Lymnaea stagnalis ganglia via transcriptome analysis

2021· article· en· W6920517422 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymnaea stagnalisTable (database)TranscriptomeGeneKEGGGenomeDe novo transcriptome assemblyHousekeeping gene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1: Table S1. Published adult CNS RNA-seq libraries from selected model organisms used in this study. Table S2. Pfam IDs used to identify transcripts encoding ion channels and ionotropic receptors in the L. stagnalis CNS. Table S3. Summary of L. stagnalis CNS RNA-seq library metrics before and after reads correction and filtering. Table S4. Mapping statistics of the CNS RNA-seq libraries to L. stagnalis genome assembly. Table S5. Transcript assembly statistics for L. stagnalis CNS RNA-seq libraries. Table S6. Proportion of transcripts containing complete and fragmented ORFs as identified by the Evigene pipeline in the “okay” and “okalt” sequence sets. Table S7. Top 20 expressed transcripts in the adult mouse brain. Table S8. Top 20 expressed transcripts in the adult X. tropicalis brain. Table S9. Top 20 expressed transcripts in the adult zebrafish brain. Table S10. Top 20 expressed transcripts in the adult fruitfly brain. Table S11. Top 20 expressed transcripts in adult C. elegans neurons. Table S12. Enriched GO terms of mouse genes in orthogroups shared amongst vertebrate and invertebrate species. Table S13. Enriched Reactome pathways of mouse genes in orthogroups shared amongst all the species examined. Table S14. Enriched KEGG pathways of mouse genes in orthogroups shared amongst all the species examined. Table S15. Transcript factors whose binding motifs are enriched in the set of mouse genes in orthogroups shared amongst all the species examined. Table S16. Enriched GO terms of mouse genes in orthgroups shared amongst only the vertebrate species examined. Table S17. Enriched Reactome pathways of mouse genes in orthgroups shared amongst only the vertebrate species examined. Table S18. Enriched KEGG pathways of mouse genes in orthgroups shared amongst only the vertebrate species examined. Table S19. Enriched GO terms of fruit fly genes in orthgroups shared amongst only the invertebrate species examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7360.129

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research→French-language works237,207→