MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6920524866 · doi:10.60692/pq86h-mkm04

Promoting presumptive diagnosis of severe HIV disease to increase uptake of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected infants

2010· article· en· W6920524866 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGreater South Information System · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntiretroviral therapyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)DiseaseInterviewPublic healthQuarter (Canadian coin)Rural area

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

7-11 November 2010, Tenth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection, Glasgow, UK Despite successful scale up of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) in Malawi, the number of children initiating ART early in their life is low and mortality of HIV infected infants not accessing ART is high. Availability of PCR remains limited and despite presumptive diagnosis (PD) is recommended in the national guidelines, it is rarely used as a reason to start HIV-exposed infants on ART. Reasons may include factors at health worker and clinic level. Knowledge of these barriers is important to increase access to ART for this high risk group. A structured questionnaire with 11 closed questions was administered to one ART clinic staff member for each site (nurse or clinician) by team-members of the regular national ART supervision for Quarter 1/2009 in the central and southern region. Questions addressed specific reasons for low uptake of PD and tested providers' knowledge of the PD definition. Finally, the interviewer explained how to make a PD correctly using a job-aid. Over 2 weeks, respondents of 49 of 173 ART-sites completed the questionnaire. They were mainly clinical officers (22) and nurses (17) from a central hospital, 5 district hospitals, 3 rural hospitals, 13 health centers, and 27 other facilities such as mission hospitals, smaller clinics run by NGOs, armed forces or privately. Forty-one clinics provided HIV testing and counseling for pregnant women on-site and 35 clinics offered antiretrovirals for PMTCT. Most providers felt that children <18 month of age are under-represented in their ART-cohort, mentioned that generally few HIV exposed children are eligible for ART in their catchment area and that limited access to PCR are reasons for low uptake of PD (34/49 respondents each). Twenty-nine saw the presence of maternal HIV-antibodies as a barrier that makes the diagnosis difficult, and 20 noted that staff at the under 5 clinic or postnatal ward rarely identifies and refers HIV exposed infants to HIV-services. Twelve providers said they generally don't register children at that age. Of the 49 providers, 15 defined presumptive diagnosis correctly and 15 partly correct. Providers seem to be aware of the need to start more HIV-infected infants on ART and of structural barriers to access this service. Improved knowledge and sensitization of providers on how to diagnose severely ill HIV-exposed infants presumptively may increase access to ART for children in this age-group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreater South Information System→Same topicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions→French-language works237,207→