MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Additional file 1 of Reporting of key methodological and ethical aspects of cluster trials in hemodialysis require improvement: a systematic review

2020· article· en· W6920701160 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of GuelphOttawa HospitalWestern UniversityInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesMcMaster UniversityLawson Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaiverInformed consentMEDLINEKey (lock)ConfidentialityCluster (spacecraft)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1: Appendix 1. Recommendations from the Ottawa Statement. Appendix 2. PRISMA Checklist. Appendix 3. Search syntax to identify relevant articles in Medline between January 1st, 2000 and July 20th, 2018 in Embase Classic+Embase, Ovid MEDLINE(R) Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE(R) Daily and Ovid MEDLINE(R). Appendix 4. Extracted data. Appendix 5. Reported information about waiver of consent for the four studies that reported a waiver of informed patient consent or research ethic committee exemption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.234
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.234
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.005
Bibliometrics0.0110.016
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8200.061

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.247
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
DomainReporting
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicDialysis and Renal Disease Management→French-language works237,207→