Additional file 1 of Transient cognitive impairment in the acute phase of stroke – prevalence, risk factors and influence on long-term prognosis in population of patients with stroke (research study – part of the PROPOLIS study)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file 1: Table S1. Comparison of patients with transient cognitive impairment (CI), stable MoCA score and cognitively impaired. Table S2. Influence of post-stroke transient cognitive impairment (CI) compared to ‘cognitively stable’ patients on three-month prognosis. Patients with delirium are excluded from the analysis. Table S3. Influence of post-stroke transient cognitive impairment (CI) compared to ‘cognitively impaired’ patients on three-month prognosis. Patients with delirium are excluded from the analysis. Table S4. Influence of post-stroke transient cognitive impairment (CI) compared to ‘cognitively stable’ patients on one-year prognosis. Patients with delirium are excluded from the analysis. Table S5. Influence of post-stroke transient cognitive impairment (CI) compared to ‘cognitively impaired’ patients on one-year prognosis. Patients with delirium are excluded from the analysis. Table S6. Influence of post-stroke transient cognitive impairment (CI) compared to ‘cognitively stable’ patients on three-month prognosis. Only patients with first MoCA score ≥ 24 are included. Table S7. Influence of post-stroke transient cognitive impairment (CI) compared to ‘cognitively impaired’ patients on three-month prognosis. Only patients with first MoCA score ≥ 24 are included. Table S8. Influence of post-stroke transient cognitive impairment (CI) compared to ‘cognitively stable’ patients on one-year prognosis. Only patients with first MoCA score ≥ 24 are included. Table S9. Influence of post-stroke transient cognitive impairment (CI) compared to ‘cognitively impaired’ patients on one-year prognosis. Only patients with first MoCA score ≥ 24 are included. Table S10. Influence of post-stroke transient cognitive impairment (CI) compared to ‘cognitively stable’ patients on three-month prognosis. Only patients with first MoCA score < 23 are included. Table S11. Influence of post-stroke transient cognitive impairment (CI) compared to ‘cognitively impaired’ patients on three-month prognosis. Only patients with first MoCA score < 23 are included. Table S12. Influence of post-stroke transient cognitive impairment (CI) compared to ‘cognitively stable’ patients on one-year prognosis. Only patients with first MoCA score < 23 are included. Table S13. Influence of post-stroke transient cognitive impairment (CI) compared to ‘cognitively impaired’ patients on one-year prognosis. Only patients with first MoCA score < 23 are included.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.724 | 0.058 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".