MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Additional file 1 of The impact of cardiovascular health and frailty on mortality for males and females across the life course

2022· article· en· W6921173189 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiovascular healthTable (database)Life tableDiseaseFrailty IndexMortality rateAssociation (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1. Expanded Methods. Additional details for assessments of cardiovascular health behaviours and factors. Expanded Results. Additional results for individual LS7 metrics and non-CVD mortality. Expanded Discussion. Additional discussion for non-CVD mortality. Table S1. 33-item frailty index. Table S2. Cardiovascular health behaviors and factors by tertiles of Life’s Simple 7 score and sex. Table S3. Combined effect of frailty and cardiovascular health on mortality in females. Table S4. Combined effect of FI and LS7 on all-cause mortality in males across ages. Table S5. Combined effect of FI and LS7 on CVD mortality in males across ages. Table S6. Association of frailty and cardiovascular health with mortality in females without a CVD diagnosis. Table S7. Association of frailty and cardiovascular health with mortality in males without a CVD diagnosis at ages 30, 50, and 70. Table S8. Characteristics of participants excluded due to incomplete cardiovascular information. Table S9. Mortality rates by frailty and Life’s Simple 7 score groups in males. Table S10. Association of frailty and cardiovascular health with non-CVD mortality in females. Table S11. Associations of frailty and cardiovascular health with non-CVD mortality in males at ages 30, 50, and 70. Table S12. Combined effect of FI and LS7 on non-CVD mortality in males across ages. Table S13. Demographic statistics of all males and females by age groups. Table S14. Cardiovascular health behaviors and factors by age groups. Figure S1. Proportion of participants in each Life’s Simple 7 score tertile by frailty index level (33-item version) for males and females. Figure S2. Simple slopes of the association between Life’s Simple 7 score and the 33-item frailty index from a linear regression model for males and females. Figure S3. Cox regression and Fine-Gray models for combined effect of Life’s Simple 7 score and frailty on all-cause and CVD-related mortality in females without a CVD diagnosis. Figure S4. Cox regression and Fine-Gray models for combined effect of Life’s Simple 7 score and frailty on all-cause and CVD-related mortality in males without a CVD diagnosis, with age centered at 30, 50, and 70. Figure S5. Multiple linear regression model for the association between individual cardiovascular health metrics and frailty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8730.141

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicFrailty in Older Adults→French-language works237,207→