Retinal cytoarchitecture is preserved in an organotypic perfused human and porcine eye model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Pathobiology of the intact human retina has been challenging to study due to its relative inaccessibility and limited sample availability. Thus, there is a great need for new translational models that can maintain human retinal integrity and cytoarchitecture. The role of physiologic intraocular pressure (IOP) and fluid flow on retinal tissue has not been well studied. Here, we present an ex vivo organotypic model to assess the impact of physiological intraocular perfusion on retinal cytoarchitecture and cell survival. We demonstrate that retinal cytoarchitecture is remarkably well preserved following re-establishment of physiological IOP and aqueous humor dynamics for up to 24 h in ex vivo whole globe porcine and human eyes, comparable to freshly preserved control eyes. Accordingly, cell death was minimized in the perfused retinas, which also displayed normal markers of cellular metabolism and astrogliosis. These results are in marked contrast to contralateral control eyes without active perfusion, which displayed excessive cell death and disrupted cytoarchitecture at the same time point. These experiments demonstrate the critical impact that physiological pressure and fluid flow have on retinal tissue, and introduce a new pre-clinical model to study human and porcine retinal health and degeneration in a relevant biomechanical setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.296 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".