MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6921889970 · doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2025.104241

Tasty bread is healthy bread?improved bread quality by fermentation with Limosilactobacillus reuteri expressing a reuteransucrase and an α-4,6-glucanotransferase

2025· article· en· W6921889970 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cereal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilUniversity of AlbertaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsAgriculture Funding Consortium
KeywordsLactobacillus reuteriFermentationStarchSucroseResistant starchWheat breadAmylase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reuteransucrase GtfA and 4,6-α-glucanotransferase GtfB are glycoside hydrolase family 70 enzymes that convert sucrose and starch, respectively, to indigestible α-glucans with potential applications in baking. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of lactobacilli expressing GtfA and GtfB reduces the digestibility of starch. An initial experiment investigated the role of GtfB using the GtfB negative Lactiplantibacillus plantarum TMW1.460 and the GtfB positive Limosilactobacillus reuteri TMW1.656Δ gtfA to produce white wheat sourdough bread with addition of 10 % and 30 % sourdough. The use of the GtfB expressing Lm. reuteri TMW1.656Δ gtfA in recipes with 10 % sourdough did not increase the bread volume or the dietary fibre content but reduced the in vitro starch digestibility. Subsequently, Lm. reuteri TMW1.656 was compared to single and double knock out mutants lacking GtfA and/or GtfB to produce white wheat sourdough bread with addition of 30 % sourdough. GtfA and GtfB showed a synergistic effect, increasing bread volume by 8.8 % ( P < 0.05) and reducing in vitro starch digestibility by 5.2 % ( P < 0.05). GtfB increased the total dietary fibre content of sourdough bread by 16.9 % relative to the mutants lacking GtfB ( P < 0.05). The characterization of starch in bread revealed that GtfB modified amylopectin toward higher resistance to hydrolysis. In conclusion, lactobacilli expressing GtfA and GtfB are improve both the sensory and the nutritional bread quality. • Sourdough fermented with strains expressing GtfA and GtfB improves bread quality. • GtfB increased the total dietary fibre content of sourdough bread. • GtfB modified amylopectin toward higher resistance to hydrolysis. • GtfA and GtfB act synergistically on bread volume and in vitro starch digestibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it