MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6921898520 · doi:10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100915

The role of electrodeposition conditions in creating MnO2-based flexible non-enzymatic glucose sensors

2025· article· en· W6921898520 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNext Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrochemical sensors and biosensors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaRussian Science Foundation
KeywordsElectrodeAscorbic acidElectrochemistryDissolutionBiosensorDeposition (geology)Cathodic protection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rapid growth in diabetes morbidity compels researchers to develop an enzymeless alternative to currently used enzymatic glucose monitors. In relation to the target glucose electrooxidation reaction, a series of non-enzymatic flexible MnO 2 -based electrodes was fabricated by means of electrodeposition. The effect of electrodeposition parameters (solution temperature, concentration, deposition potential) on morphological and electrochemical characteristics of prepared MnO 2 samples was investigated. To exhibit practical prospects of electrodeposited MnO 2 electrocatalysts for the in vivo use, glucose electrooxidation was performed in an isotonic NaCl-based phosphate-buffered saline with pH 7.40 containing physiological (1–30 mM) glucose concentrations. A rotating ring-disk electrode was applied to reveal differences in the electrodeposition process under various conditions as well as to solidly establish potentials of MnO 2 cathodic dissolution and O 2 /Cl 2 evolution at pH 7.40. For the most active sensor electrode with pronounced MnO 2 surface architecture a linear square root concentration plot in the full physiological glucose range (1–30 mM) was demonstrated. Sensitivity values up to ca. 41.8 and 81.2 μA mM −0.5 cm −2 at 25 and 37 °C, respectively, were observed. Excellent reproducibility of the glucose oxidation current and good glucose selectivity of electrodeposited MnO 2 in relation to some common interferent substances (fructose, galactose, xylose, ribose, urea, lactic acid, acetone, ascorbic acid, paracetamol) were revealed. • Electrodeposition parameters strongly affect surface structure of a MnO 2 catalyst. • Electrodeposited MnO 2 provides reproducible glucose oxidation currents (pH 7.40). • Concentration plot shows linearity in a physiological glucose range (1–30 mM). • Sensitivity in the glucose oxidation achieves 27.9–41.8 μA mM −0.5 cm −2 geo at 25 °C. • MnO 2 affords glucose selectivity in the presence of physiological interferents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNext MaterialsSame topicElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsFrench-language works237,207