MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Virgo Environmental Survey Tracing Ionised Gas Emission (VESTIGE)

2025· article· en· W6921922196 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalaxyVirgo ClusterLuminosityStar formationLuminosity functionStellar massScalingStar (game theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Virgo Environmental Survey Tracing Ionised Gas Emission (VESTIGE) survey is a blind narrow-band Hα + [N II] imaging survey of the Virgo cluster carried out with MegaCam of the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope. The survey provides deep narrow-band images for 385 galaxies hosting star-forming H II regions. We identify individual H II regions and measure their main physical properties such as Hα luminosity, equivalent diameter, and electron density with the purpose of deriving standard relations that can serve as a reference for future local and high-z studies of H II regions in star-forming systems in different environments. For this purpose, we used a complete sample of ≃13.000 H II regions of luminosity L(Hα)≥1037 erg s−1 in order to derive the main statistical properties of H II regions in unperturbed systems, which are identified as those galaxies with a normal H I gas content, and are in total 64 objects. These are the composite Hα luminosity function, equivalent diameter and electron density distribution, and luminosity-size relation. We also derived the main scaling relations between several parameters representative of the H II regions (total number, luminosity of the first ranked regions, fraction of the diffuse component, best-fit parameters of the Schechter luminosity function measured for individual galaxies) and those characterising the properties of the host galaxies (stellar mass, star formation rate and specific star formation rate, stellar mass and star formation rate surface density, metallicity, molecular-to-atomic gas ratio, total gas-to-dust mass ratio). We briefly discuss the results of this analysis and their implications in the study of the star formation process in galaxy discs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207