MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hypervelocity stars in the

2020· article· en· W6921939406 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Robotics and Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBrookhaven National LaboratoryNational Cancer InstituteAustralian Astronomical Optics-MacquarieSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryOffice of ScienceMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemNational Central UniversityQueen's UniversityNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekCurtin University of TechnologyPlanetary Science DivisionMonash UniversityDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di PadovaSwinburne University of TechnologyGordon and Betty Moore FoundationQueen's University BelfastDurham UniversityYork UniversityNASA Exoplanet Science InstituteAustralian GovernmentSpace Telescope Science InstituteAustralian National UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityAstronomy Australia LimitedVanderbilt UniversityNational Computational InfrastructureLos Alamos National LaboratoryCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUniversità degli Studi di PadovaPrinceton UniversityAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversity of WashingtonEuropean Space AgencyAustralian National Data ServiceJohns Hopkins UniversityOhio State UniversityNational Science FoundationU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian InstitutionNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUniversity of PortsmouthScience Mission DirectorateYale University
KeywordsStarsHypervelocityMilky WayKinematicsSpectral lineHaloPosition (finance)Galactic haloRadial velocity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hypervelocity star (HVS) survey conducted at the Multiple Mirror Telescope (MMT) identified 42 B-type stars in the Galactic halo whose radial velocity in the Galactic rest-frame exceeds +275 km s−1. In order to unravel the nature and origin of those high-velocity outliers, their complete six-dimensional phase space information is needed. To this end, we complemented positions and proper motions from the second data release of Gaia with revised radial velocities and spectrophotometric distances that are based on a reanalysis of the available MMT spectra of 40 objects using state-of-the-art model spectra and a tailored analysis strategy. The resulting position and velocity vectors for 37 stars were then used as input for a subsequent kinematic investigation to obtain as complete a picture as possible. The combination of projected rotational velocity, position in the Kiel diagram, and kinematic properties suggests that all objects in the sample except two (B576, B598) are very likely to be main sequence stars. While the available data are still not precise enough to constrain the place of origin for 19 program stars, we identified eight objects that either come from the outer rim of the Galactic disk or not from the disk at all, along with ten that presumably stem from the Galactic disk. For almost all of those 18 targets with more or less well-constrained spatial origin, the Galactic center (GC) is disqualified as a possible place of origin. The most notable exception is B576, the origin of which coincides extremely well with the GC when assuming a blue horizontal branch nature for it. HVS 22 is by far the most extreme object in the sample. Although its origin is completely unconstrained, an ejection from the GC by the Hills mechanism is the most plausible explanation for its current Galactic rest-frame velocity of $ 1530^{+690}_{-560} $ km s−1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)Same topicEducational Robotics and EngineeringFrench-language works237,207