Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context. Supercluster A in the extragalactic H <ns0:sc>ii</ns0:sc> region <ns0:ext-link ext-link-type="aoi">NGC 2363</ns0:ext-link> is remarkable for the hypersonic gas seen as faint extended broad emission lines with a full-width zero intensity of 7000 ${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$. Aims. We explore the possibility that the observed broad profiles are the result of the interaction of a high-velocity cluster wind with dense photoionized clumps. Methods. The geometry considered is that of near static photoionized condensations at the surface of which turbulent mixing layers arise as a result of the interaction with the hot wind. The approximative treatment of turbulence was carried out using the mixing length approach of Cantó & Raga. The code <ns0:sc>mappings i</ns0:sc>c was used to derive the mean quantities describing the flow and to compute the line emissivities within the turbulent layers. The velocity projection in three dimensions of the line sources was carried out analytically. Results. A fast entraining wind of up to ≈$ 4300\,$${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$ appears to be required to reproduce the faint wings of the broad Hα and [O <ns0:sc>iii</ns0:sc>] profiles. A slower wind of 3500 ${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$, however, can still reproduce the bulk of the broad component and does provide a better fit than an ad hoc Gaussian profile. Conclusions. Radial acceleration in 3D (away from supercluster A) of the emission gas provides a reasonable first-order fit to the broad line component. No broad component is predicted for the [N <ns0:sc>ii</ns0:sc>] and [S <ns0:sc>ii</ns0:sc>] lines, as observed. The wind velocity required is uncomfortably high and alternative processes that would provide comparable constant acceleration of the emission gas up to 4000 ${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$ might have to be considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".