MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6921988819 · doi:10.1016/s1474

Association of LRRK2 exonic variants with susceptibility to Parkinson's disease: a case-control study.

2007· article· en· W6921988819 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueYUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHistory of Computing Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYonsei University College of MedicineMedical Research CouncilInstituut Born-BungeCentre hospitalier régional universitaire de LilleVlaamse regeringSkånes universitetssjukhusŚląski Uniwersytet Medyczny w KatowicachSvenska LäkaresällskapetUniversiteit AntwerpenBijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGentAssociation France ParkinsonSvenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk ForskningVetenskapsrådetParkinsonfondenUniversitair Ziekenhuis AntwerpenMinistero della SaluteUniversità degli Studi di Milano-BicoccaKarolinska InstitutetUniwersytet Śląski w KatowicachYonsei UniversityUniversity of ThessalyInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleAgence Nationale de la RechercheSouth African Medical Research CouncilEli Lilly and CompanyFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekHermann und Lilly Schilling-Stiftung für Medizinische ForschungGenome British ColumbiaCentralsjukhuset KristianstadFondation de FranceBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungGlaxoSmithKlineLunds UniversitetNational Institutes of HealthVolkswagen FoundationMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsLRRK2Odds ratioGenotypingMinor allele frequencyHaplotypeAlleleDiseaseGenetic associationGenotypeAllele frequency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Background The leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 gene (LRRK2) harbours highly penetrant mutations that are linked to familial parkinsonism. However, the extent of its polymorphic variability in relation to risk of Parkinson's disease (PD) has not been assessed systematically. We therefore assessed the frequency of LRRK2 exonic variants in individuals with and without PD, to investigate the role of the variants in PD susceptibility.\n\nMETHODS: LRRK2 was genotyped in patients with PD and controls from three series (white, Asian, and Arab-Berber) from sites participating in the Genetic Epidemiology of Parkinson's Disease Consortium. Genotyping was done for exonic variants of LRRK2 that were identified through searches of literature and the personal communications of consortium members. Associations with PD were assessed by use of logistic regression models. For variants that had a minor allele frequency of 0쨌5% or greater, single variant associations were assessed, whereas for rarer variants information was collapsed across variants.\n\nFINDINGS: 121 exonic LRRK2 variants were assessed in 15��540 individuals: 6995 white patients with PD and 5595 controls, 1376 Asian patients and 962 controls, and 240 Arab-Berber patients and 372 controls. After exclusion of carriers of known pathogenic mutations, new independent risk associations were identified for polymorphic variants in white individuals (M1646T, odds ratio 1쨌43, 95% CI 1쨌15-1쨌78; p=0쨌0012) and Asian individuals (A419V, 2쨌27, 1쨌35-3쨌83; p=0쨌0011). A protective haplotype (N551K-R1398H-K1423K) was noted at a frequency greater than 5% in the white and Asian series, with a similar finding in the Arab-Berber series (combined odds ratio 0쨌82, 0쨌72-0쨌94; p=0쨌0043). Of the two previously reported Asian risk variants, G2385R was associated with disease (1쨌73, 1쨌20-2쨌49; p=0쨌0026), but no association was noted for R1628P (0쨌62, 0쨌36-1쨌07; p=0쨌087). In the Arab-Berber series, Y2189C showed potential evidence of risk association with PD (4쨌48, 1쨌33-15쨌09; p=0쨌012).\n\nINTERPRETATION: The results for LRRK2 show that several rare and common genetic variants in the same gene can have independent effects on disease risk. LRRK2, and the pathway in which it functions, is important in the cause and pathogenesis of PD in a greater proportion of patients with this disease than previously believed. These results will help discriminate those patients who will benefit most from therapies targeted at LRRK2 pathogenic activity.\n\nFUNDING: Michael J Fox Foundation and National Institutes of Health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations635
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library)Same topicHistory of Computing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207