MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6922191961 · doi:10.11575/prism/47329

Catholic Teacher Preparation and Faith Permeation: An Exploratory Case Study

2024· other· en· W6922191961 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaithCurriculumExploratory researchInstitutionHigher educationPermeationSet (abstract data type)Educational institution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this exploratory case study was to explore the ways that Catholic postsecondary institutions were perceived by their Catholic educator graduates to prepare Catholic teachers for the work of faith permeation in Catholic schools. Faith permeation is the process of integrating Catholicism into every aspect of a Catholic school. Church teaching suggests that a sort of permeation should also exist in Catholic postsecondary institutions and that their graduates should be equipped with qualities that are similar to those the Church expects of its teachers. This study therefore set out to explore the ways that Catholic teachers felt they were prepared for permeation by Catholic postsecondary institutions using qualitative methods and a critical realist ontology. The case studied was Alberta Catholic educators who hold an education-relevant qualification from a Catholic postsecondary institution and have worked in a Catholic school for at least one full school year. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven such educators to explore how they practice permeation and how the Catholic postsecondary institutions they attended informed their practice. Document analysis was also conducted into the standards used to assess Catholic teachers in Alberta, which found that they align with the Church’s expectations for teachers. The findings suggested that permeation is a structure that operates through both the implicit and the explicit curriculum of a school and that the Catholic postsecondary institution is a concrete universal with the causal power to effectively prepare teacher graduates for permeation through its explicit and implicit curriculum, including graduates who were not well-formed when they entered the institution. However, this power can be mitigated if instructors are perceived to contradict Church teaching either in their overt instruction or in the way they live their lives, as well as by other ways the postsecondary institution is mediated. Recommendations are made regarding Catholic postsecondary teacher preparation based on the research. The findings of this study provide a foundation for future research into the ways that Catholic teachers can be formed to effect faith permeation in Catholic schools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→