MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6922267952 · doi:10.11575/prism/39663

Relationship between hydrogen sulphide (H2S) distribution and regional burial/uplift history in the Lower Triassic Montney Formation, northeastern British Columbia, Canada

2022· other· en· W6922267952 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaciesCretaceousPetrographyDiagenesisStructural basinMaturity (psychological)KarstFluvialCementation (geology)Sedimentary rock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding a basin’s thermal history is essential when examining past and current fluid distributions. Knowledge of the origin of non-hydrocarbon gases, including hydrogen sulphide (H2S), aids in understanding the complex organic-inorganic interactions that control basin evolution. This study provides a preliminary workflow to estimate the regional burial and uplift/erosion history of the Lower Triassic Montney Formation using a Lower Cretaceous Mannville Group vitrinite reflectance dataset. The calculated maximum burial is a first-order thermal maturity proxy. Results show variations in regional Montney burial and uplift. Specifically, increased uplift/erosion in the central area of the Montney and relatively less uplift and erosion toward the southern extent of the play. To better understand controls on the highly variable H2S distribution, identified facies are constrained within a detailed stratigraphic framework in northeastern British Columbia, highlighting the vertical and lateral facies heterogeneity (Township 79-81 and Ranges 18-14). Additionally, local structural lineaments may have influenced fluid migration. Sulphate-rich fluids migrating through fractures may preferentially enter laterally permeable units. Due to regional burial history variations, fracture cementation is likely non-uniform, meaning not all fractures are fluid conduits. Depending on the location within the basin, a once permeable unit may now have diagenetic cementation, creating lateral permeability variations for sulphate-rich fluid migration. The current Montney Formation H2S content predominantly results from in situ thermochemical sulphate reduction (TSR). The regional burial variations result in thermal differences, implying that TSR should also be non-uniform across the Montney. Upper Montney H2S concentration increases eastward within the study area, likely due to up-dip migration through permeable coarser-grained siltstones and trapping due to stratigraphic pinch out. Additionally, the elevated H2S is likely influenced by extraformational factors, including eastward thinning of the Middle Triassic succession, bringing the evaporite-rich Charlie Lake Formation into proximity with the Montney. Moreover, the Sunset Prairie Formation directly overlies the Montney and has an erosional edge that correlates to elevated Upper Montney H2S. Both relationships may lead to more significant amounts of sulphate minerals in the east supplying the sulphate required to generate H2S via TSR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→