Uwagi o wczesnych gotyckich płytach nagrobnych na Śląsku
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ROMUALD KACZMAREK (University of Wroclaw) / Notes on early gothic tombstones in Silesia (with particular reference to figural ones) The article discusses a group of the oldest Gothic tombstones in Silesia, dating from the late 13th to the end of the first quarter of the 14th century. They are distinguished by an engraved or sculpted representation of the figure of the de- ceased. They are an important testimony to the changes in the typology of sepul- chral monuments at the end of the 13th century. In view of the uncertain informa- tion regarding the earliest sarcophagi with carved figures or the disputed dating of those that remain, the slabs in question are the oldest evidence of this type of monument in Silesia. The linear form of the representation of the figures on the slabs is close to the art of drawing, hence these monuments should be regarded as an important addition to the knowledge of Silesian painting and drawing in a period from which we do not have a significant number of accounts. The analy- sis of the costumes of the depicted lay and clerical figures allows us to gain new information about this sphere of material culture, as well as about the symbolism expressed by the clothing and the attributes presented. The article also proposes revisions to some of the previous findings regarding the identification of com- memorated individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.032 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".