MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6922331009 · doi:10.11575/prism/40729

The Impact of Exercise on Gut Microbiota in a Survivor to Germ-free Mouse Translational Model of Breast Cancer

2021· other· en· W6922331009 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGerman Social Sciences and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGut floraLachnospiraceaeBreast cancerPrebioticCancerColorectal cancerRuminococcus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breast cancer is the leading cause of global cancer incidence. Strategies to improve breast cancer treatment and health outcomes in survivors are needed to decrease mortality, mitigate side effects, and prevent recurrence. The gut microbiota is altered in individuals with breast cancer, can be affected by treatments such as chemotherapy, and plays a role in response to cancer treatments. It may be modified by environmental factors such as dietary components and exercise. In the present study, the Alberta Cancer Exercise (ACE) program was investigated as a strategy to favorably modify the gut microbiota of breast cancer survivors who had undergone chemotherapy. In a follow-up germ-free mouse study, the ability of exercise-responsive gut microbiota, alone or with prebiotic fiber supplementation, to alter tumor growth was interrogated using fecal microbiota transfer (FMT). In the cancer survivors, there was a significant enrichment in Dialister, Oscillospiraceae, and Paraprevotella following exercise (p < 0.01). In the germ-free mice, tumor volume trended consistently lower over time in the groups colonized with post-exercise gut microbiota compared to the group colonized with pre-exercise gut microbiota, with statistically significant differences found on day 16 and day 22. Tumor volume was further suppressed with prebiotic fiber supplementation. Gut microbial alpha and beta diversity differed across groups. Beta diversity and differential abundance analyses revealed that both the tumor cell injection and chemotherapy altered the gut microbial community in the mice. A potentially beneficial enhancement of Parasutterella and Lachnospiraceae and depletion of Anaerostipes and Ruminococcus gnavus was identified on day 22 in the group receiving prebiotic. Cytokine analysis of tumor tissue and serum indicated that the influence of the various FMTs resulted in distinct tumor microenvironments. The tumors of mice colonized with exercise-responsive microbiota exhibited lower levels of angiogenic VEGF among other markers, and greater levels of cytokines previously associated with positive Paclitaxel response. This was augmented with prebiotic supplementation. Exercise and prebiotic demonstrated potential to enhance anti-tumor immunity through advantageous gut microbiota modulation in breast cancer populations and should be further explored as adjuvants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it