Potential For Expansion Of The Canadian Wind Energy Industry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada has the attributes required to become a global leader in wind energy production. There are a number of forces driving the development of wind power including climate, environment, and economics. However, there are also obstacles such as public acceptance, storage, and transmission that the industry must overcome to ensure that the widespread implementation of wind energy in Canada is successful. This paper analyzes these driving forces and barriers and investigates the potential for expansion of the Canadian wind energy industry. The insights gained from this literature review are summarized into five strategic recommendations for wind energy development in Canada in the areas of economics, environment, technology, society, and policy. It is important that governments prioritize wind energy and provide incentives like feed-in-tariffs and tax breaks, to increase wind development. To account for the environmental and human health consequences of conventional fuels, a national carbon pricing mechanism is needed. This will help improve the economics of using wind power by making it more cost-competitive with cheap, polluting conventional energy sources. Increased investment into wind power technology, especially turbines, transmission infrastructure, and combined power systems (i.e. wind-hydro) will create technological improvements and increase energy efficiency. Currently, there is significant opposition to wind power in Canada, which can potentially hinder the progression of the industry. Creating bestpractice guidelines and conducting meaningful public consultation based on credible and empirical information can help to dispel many of the misperceptions about wind energy. Finally, it was determined that policy is the most important strategic area, as it is a common driver to each of the other areas and can make the biggest impact on the expansion of wind energy in Canada. A national energy policy that prioritizes wind power is an essential foundation for future development. From this, provincial and territorial energy strategies can be developed. Strong government policy support is the most important factor to Canada becoming a global leader in wind power.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".