MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of Pre-hospital Metformin Use on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes and Sepsis

2024· article· en· W6922410870 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Robotics and Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetforminDiabetes mellitusSepsisCochrane LibraryMeta-analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background There is growing evidence that pre-hospital use of metformin reduces mortality in patients with diabetes and sepsis; however, the effect of metformin on clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes and sepsis remains controversial. Therefore, there is a need for a systematic review and Meta-analysis of existing studies to further evaluate whether metformin can improve mortality and other clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes and sepsis. Objective To systematically evaluate the effects of pre-hospital metformin use on mortality, initial plasma lactate level and organ dysfunction in patients with diabetes and sepsis. Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, China Biomedical Literature Service System, Wanfang Data, CNKI and other databases were searched by computer for Chinese and English literature on the effects of pre-hospital metformin use on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and diabetes from inception to March 15, 2023. The test group (MET group) involved adult patients with diabetes and sepsis received pre-hospital metformin use, and the control group (NM group) involved adult patients with diabetes and sepsis who did not receive pre-hospital metformin use. After screening, data extraction and literature quality evaluation were conducted by two researchers, Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 12 papers were included in this study, involving 12 320 patients with diabetes and sepsis, with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) scores of 7-8. The results of Meta-analysis showed that the mortality rate (OR=0.61, 95%CI=0.46 to 0.80, P<0.001) and the use rate of vasopressors (OR=0.83, 95%CI=0.69 to 0.98, P=0.03) in MET group were lower than those in NM group; there was no significant difference in initial plasma lactate level (MD=0.31, 95%CI=-0.12 to 0.75, P=0.16) , serum creatinine level (MD=-0.81, 95%CI=-0.48 to 0.13, P=0.25) , initial blood glucose level (MD=32.94, 95%CI=-10.12 to 76.01, P=0.13) and mechanical ventilation (OR=0.90, 95%CI=0.77 to 1.06, P=0.23) between the MET group and NM group. Conclusion The pre-hospital use of metformin can reduce the mortality of patients with diabetes and sepsis, and reduce the use rate of vasoppressors in corresponding patients, providing updated evidence that metformin can reduce the mortality of patients with diabetes and sepsis. However, whether it can reduce the sepsis severity score and reduce the maximum dose of norepinephrine in patients with diabetes and sepsis remains to be further studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicEducational Robotics and EngineeringFrench-language works237,207