Comparative study of different commodity standards for concentrated milk products based on an analysis and discussion of terms, categorizations, definitions, and relevant provisions in the standards
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Condensed milk products are common dairy products in the Chinese market and international trade. With the development of dairy industry and the emergence of new products， the contents of commodity standards are constantly being revised and updated. By comparing the content and management logic of domestic and international standards， it is helpful to learn from the standards management experience of other countries and constantly improve our standards. A review of the development and evolution of China’s national standards for concentrated milk products was performed. The regulations and standards of concentrated milk products from relevant international organizations， countries， and regions were compared and analyzed. Commodity standards from the Codex Alimentarius Commission and relevant mandatory standards and regulations from the European Union， the United States， Canada， Japan， the Republic of Korea， Australia， and New Zealand were collecting and summarized. The comparisons and analyses focused on the similarities and differences in terminology， definitions， categorization-relevant indices， and labeling requirements of various concentrated milk products under different commodity standards. The definition of evaporated milk， the product properties and composition requirements of concentrated milk， and the corresponding relations between the terms of various concentrated milk products were researched and discussed. Management suggestions and key points regarding the updating of condensed milk standards are provided to support standard management activities in China.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".