Report of the Provincial Archives Department of the province of British Columbia for the year ended December 31st, 1913
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"The reports for 1893/94-1909 include the Archives under the heading, 'Northwest collection.' The Provincial Archives became separate from the Provincial Library in 1908, and published reports separately in 1910 and 1913. The report for 1921 was entitled Report of the Provincial Library and Archives. Reports were printed for the years 1893/94, 1895, 1896,1897, 1898, 1899-1900, 1900-1901, 1902-1903, 1907, 1909, 1910, 1913, with 1921 being a joint report. Most reports are also in the Clerk's papers, and those for 1910, 1913 and 1921 are also in the Sessional papers of British Columbia. See especially following reports which contain material not published elsewhere: 1900-1901, Appendix 4: 'Titles of works relating to the history and discovery of British Columbia and the North-west portion of America'; 1910, Appendix A: 'Papers relating to Vancouver Island,' 'Papers relating to the colony of British Columbia,' and 'Papers relating to the province of British Columbia.' Appendix B contains important letters, transcripts and miscellaneous papers. 1913, section 2: 'Papers relating to the colonization of Vancouver Island,' with letters by Lieut. Adam Dundas, Sir George Simpson, Charles Enderby, James E. Fitzgerald, W. Colquhoun Grant, Right Rev. Modeste Demers, James Douglas and David Thompson. The same section has a 'Report on Vancouver Island.'" -- Lowther, B. J., & Laing, M. (1968). A bibliography of British Columbia: Laying the foundations, 1849-1899. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria, p. 122.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.126 | 0.038 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".