MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6923401028 · doi:10.14288/1.0431198

A humanities-based pedagogy of death : apocalyptic prose as public reimbursement collapse competency

2023· article· en· W6923401028 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicModern American Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGriefRelation (database)ReimbursementProcess (computing)Work (physics)Poetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this humanities-based inquiry is to explore how poetic prose within apocalyptic fiction opens to realities of mourning and relationality, each a component in the ways in which imagined systems in collapse are nurtured in the process of dying. I conceive of mourning to mean a recognition of real loss and a response that is softened to the realities of grief without being paralyzed by its depth. I conceive of relationality as the experienced impacts of relation with more-than-human kin and ancestors and the as-yet-born, as these relations provide comprehensive understandings of entangled ways of being, including death. The systems in collapse are located in public reimbursement, the systems that provide or prohibit drug and device accessibility within Canada. From the lens of the reimbursement realities of Type 1 diabetes, I identify these systems as being removed from the needs of patients, a series of actions that consistently fail to be responsive to the realities of persons with disease. These systems underscore the ways the exclusion of the oppressed (patients) from the decision-making of the oppressors (the producers and the distributors of health technologies) necessitates the current or future death of the system. Using select works of Paulo Freire and Boaventura de Sousa Santos, this systems death is explored through the lens of abyssal thinking. Since I have now identified the perceived collapse, in this work I attempt to destabilize conventional models of repair-through-progress by advantaging the process of hospice. Here, hospicing does not refer to conventional hospice programs, but instead draws from an unconventional source to explore ways in which a pedagogy of death can be applied across or within broad systems death: the poetry of apocalyptic fiction within Cormac McCarthy’s The Road. Two thematic elements, mourning and relationality, are applied as a poetic lens through which to invigorate imaginaries on the constituent parts of death, the macabre-ness of the reanimated corpse or the repulsion of fetid flesh. These elements urge a leaning-in to death, to become familiar with death, in order to speak to collapse and support the eventual demise of the modern system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it