Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div> Background Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder that negatively impacts thousands of patients in Canada. The unexpected nature of PD is associated with a decline in mental health. The highest level of psychological stress occurs during the early years following the diagnosis. Objectives To understand the psychological stress associated with prognostic uncertainties in recently diagnosed PD patients, uncover the gaps in the current support systems, and recommend areas for improvement in the support services that aim to decrease the psychological stress associated with receiving the PD diagnosis. Methods An exploratory qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 13 PD patients diagnosed for more than 6 months and less than 5 years. Participants were recruited from the Toronto Western Hospital Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto, Ontario, Canada until saturation of key themes was reached. Results Five major themes were identified capturing the lived experiences of PD patients following diagnosis: 1) the circumstances of receiving the diagnosis and its psychological impact on PD patients, 2) the impact of intrapersonal factors on the PD journey, 3) the role of social relationships in PD patient’s life, 4) the interaction of PD patients with different elements of the healthcare system, and 5) support services available for recently diagnosed PD patients. Conclusions This study uncovers the psychological burden faced by PD patients due to prognostic uncertainties and insufficient support systems. It emphasizes the importance of a patient-centered approach for improving their quality of life and healthcare experiences through personalized support services. </div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.088 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".