MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925069295 · doi:10.1594/pangaea.944865

CTD profiles in the bay of Sept-Îles in 2017/2018

2022· dataset· en· W6925069295 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePublishing Network for Geoscientific and Environmental Data (PANGAEA) (Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research) · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Education and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayShoreBiogeochemical cycleCurrent (fluid)CTDSampling (signal processing)Global Positioning System

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This data set contains temperature, salinity, oxygen, fluorescence, turbidity, and currents data collected in the bay of Sept-îles, on the north shore of the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada. Five sampling campaigns were conducted from May to September of 2017, to assess seasonal variations in the oceanographic conditions. An additional campaign was conducted in May 2018, focusing on the measurement of currents. These surveys covered the inside of the bay and the nearby archipelago. The bay of Sept-Îles has recently been the subject of a multidisciplinary study by the Canadian Healthy Oceans Network (CHONe II) because it is a heavily industrialized and urban coastal area at Canadian midlatitudes. It is therefore a good site to study the impact of such human presence on adjacent marine ecosystems. The objective of this data set was to enable the development and calibration of hydrodynamic and biogeochemical models of the bay, which was hindered by scarce knowledge of the environmental conditions. Water properties were collected using a Seabird Electronics SBE19plus and a Sontek CastAway CTD probe. Currents were measured using a towed acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) model Teledyne RDI Sentinel V, and passive surface drifters which used Spot GPS probes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublishing Network for Geoscientific and Environmental Data (PANGAEA) (Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research)Same topicHistorical Education and SocietyFrench-language works237,207