MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925168417 · doi:10.17026/dans-xv8-4c4t

Sociale en culturele situatie Nijmegen 1991-1993

2022· dataset· en· W6925168417 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDANS Data Station SSH · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRespondentAudience measurementPopulationNewspaperThe artsEthnic groupSpouseQuarter (Canadian coin)Nationality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Three independent measurements of the social and cultural activities and situation of the population of Nijmegen. since when does respondent reside in Nijmegen / social status of residential quarter / several aspects of ( previous ) job / church membership, special task or function within church, active participation in groups or clubs of church / life after death, bible is gods' word, does heaven, hell purgatory and devil exist / nationality of ( parents of ) respondent / social inequality between ethnic minorities and Dutch people in general / political interest / educational career / membership of groups, organization, clubs, societies / number of hours per week spend on organizations etc. / organizations with social activities like helping aged people / respondent has been social supporting people during last half year, time spending, time-budgeting / number of days watching tv, not in weekend / average time spending, time budgeting watching tv, also on saturday and sunday / watching newsbulletins and news programs / frequency of watching several tv programs / visiting classical concerts, opera, ballet, musea, arts exposures, frequency of visiting last year and during whole life / readership of books and newspapers / education and occupation of spouse / social inequality between women and men / differences in income / financial expectations / differences between rich and poor people in our country / education and occupation of father / during respondents childhood: housing situation, readership of parents, visits of parents to opera, theatre music, musea, arts exposures / abortion, euthanasia, suicide / social network: three persons: age, sex, occupation, education, religion, political preference, relationship with respondent, frequency of contact / statements about: important things in life / personal qualities / most important Dutch political problem / religion / christianity existence of higher powers / good and evil in the world / suffering and dead / influence of philosophy of life on making decisions and daily life / reason for inequality between ethnic minorities and Dutch people / freedom of speech and demonstrations / view of humankind / political aims / traits of Dutch people / coping with emotions and problems / social supporting / ( traits of ) ethnic minorities / reason for watching television / importance of employment / gender roles / reason for inequality between women and men / importance of local news, clubs and organizations / satisfaction with residential quarter / reason for existence of poor and rich people / trade unions / divisions of housekeeping tasks in respondents' cohabitation or marriage / emotional balance of last few weeks special topics 1993: children at school in residential quarter / shops nearby / frequency of visiting community / relationship with neighbours / topics of conversation with people living in the neighbourhood / feelings of unsafety in quarter / victimization of theft, aggressiveness / political preference of father and mother / education and occupation of father-in-law/ education mother-in-law / political interest of spouse, party preference / division of childcare tasks in respondents' cohabitation or marriage centre / readership of quarter newsbulletins. Background variables: basic characteristics/ housing situation/ household characteristics/ occupation/employment/ income/capital assets/ education/ social class/ politics/ religion/ consumption of durables/ readership, mass media, and 'cultural' exposure/ organizational membership</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.522
Teacher spread0.387 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it