MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925168417 · doi:10.17026/dans-xv8-4c4t

Sociale en culturele situatie Nijmegen 1991-1993

2022· dataset· en· W6925168417 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDANS Data Station SSH · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRespondentAudience measurementPopulationNewspaperThe artsEthnic groupSpouseQuarter (Canadian coin)Nationality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three independent measurements of the social and cultural activities and situation of the population of Nijmegen. since when does respondent reside in Nijmegen / social status of residential quarter / several aspects of ( previous ) job / church membership, special task or function within church, active participation in groups or clubs of church / life after death, bible is gods' word, does heaven, hell purgatory and devil exist / nationality of ( parents of ) respondent / social inequality between ethnic minorities and Dutch people in general / political interest / educational career / membership of groups, organization, clubs, societies / number of hours per week spend on organizations etc. / organizations with social activities like helping aged people / respondent has been social supporting people during last half year, time spending, time-budgeting / number of days watching tv, not in weekend / average time spending, time budgeting watching tv, also on saturday and sunday / watching newsbulletins and news programs / frequency of watching several tv programs / visiting classical concerts, opera, ballet, musea, arts exposures, frequency of visiting last year and during whole life / readership of books and newspapers / education and occupation of spouse / social inequality between women and men / differences in income / financial expectations / differences between rich and poor people in our country / education and occupation of father / during respondents childhood: housing situation, readership of parents, visits of parents to opera, theatre music, musea, arts exposures / abortion, euthanasia, suicide / social network: three persons: age, sex, occupation, education, religion, political preference, relationship with respondent, frequency of contact / statements about: important things in life / personal qualities / most important Dutch political problem / religion / christianity existence of higher powers / good and evil in the world / suffering and dead / influence of philosophy of life on making decisions and daily life / reason for inequality between ethnic minorities and Dutch people / freedom of speech and demonstrations / view of humankind / political aims / traits of Dutch people / coping with emotions and problems / social supporting / ( traits of ) ethnic minorities / reason for watching television / importance of employment / gender roles / reason for inequality between women and men / importance of local news, clubs and organizations / satisfaction with residential quarter / reason for existence of poor and rich people / trade unions / divisions of housekeeping tasks in respondents' cohabitation or marriage / emotional balance of last few weeks special topics 1993: children at school in residential quarter / shops nearby / frequency of visiting community / relationship with neighbours / topics of conversation with people living in the neighbourhood / feelings of unsafety in quarter / victimization of theft, aggressiveness / political preference of father and mother / education and occupation of father-in-law/ education mother-in-law / political interest of spouse, party preference / division of childcare tasks in respondents' cohabitation or marriage centre / readership of quarter newsbulletins. Background variables: basic characteristics/ housing situation/ household characteristics/ occupation/employment/ income/capital assets/ education/ social class/ politics/ religion/ consumption of durables/ readership, mass media, and 'cultural' exposure/ organizational membership

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.522
Teacher spread0.387 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDANS Data Station SSHSame topicHealth and Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207