MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925248677 · doi:10.17895/ices.pub.25443175

Recent intrusion of Labrador Shelf waters into the Gulf of St. Lawrence and its influence on the plankton community and higher trophic levels

2002· other· en· W6925248677 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2002
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrophic levelPlanktonZooplanktonDiatomPhytoplanktonArcticAbundance (ecology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No abstracts are to be cited without prior reference to the author.Wintertime hydrographic data obtained in the Gulf of St. Lawrence (GSL) since 1996 suggest large intrusions of dense and cold surface waters from the Labrador shelf in 2001. These intrusions contributed significantly to the summertime coldness of the intermediate layer in the GSL despite relatively mild winter conditions. Several changes in the plankton community were associated with this intrusion. A major change is the first occurrence of the diatom Neodenticula seminae covering most of the GSL in spring 2001. This is very unusual since this diatom is usually found in the North Pacific, not in the North Atlantic. Because of its parallel occurrence on the Labrador Shelf, it is inferred that this Pacific species was introduced into the GSL via natural advection processes across the Arctic and down the Labrador Current. Other phytoplankton observations of typical Labrador shelf waters in the GSL support this hypothesis. Another important change is a highly significant increase in the abundance of the Arctic hyperiid amphipod Themisto libellula. Numbers increased from 0.17 ind. m-2 in 2000 to 10 ind. m-2 in September 2001. This is the most important increase in abundance of this species in the last decade. These changes in ocean circulation processes probably have a significant impact on higher trophic level interactions as suggested by an increase of the occurrence of this zooplankton species in the cod diet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDFrench-language works237,207