MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925467072 · doi:10.17882/102675

ISIS-Fish Database: Life History and Spatial Distribution of Sole, Megrim, Anglerfish, Thornback ray, and Cuckoo ray Populations in the Bay of Biscay

2025· dataset· en· W6925467072 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueSEANOE · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSocial and Demographic Issues in Germany
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayDemersal zoneCuckooPopulationContext (archaeology)Demersal fishAbundance (ecology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the context of the MACCO project (https://www.macco.fr/), we have developed an ISIS-Fish database with the objective of describing the spatial and monthly life cycle of 7 fish species of commercial interest in the mixed demersal fishery in the Bay of Biscay. In the case of megrim, cuckoo ray, thornback ray, anglerfish and sole, the population dynamics have been described in detail, both by age class and by global model. In addition, the distribution areas of these species according to their life stage have been mapped and included in the database. The settings of Hake and nephrops population dynamics are derived from a previous model (Seanoe https://doi.org/10.17882/86233). The database is accompanied by all the data and information necessary for the reproduction of the results and the assessment of the variability of the system. The biological parameters of each species are presented in summary species sheets with references, and in Excel files that contain all the variability observed in the literature and in the sea survey data. Our mapping work allow an appreciation of the variability between months and years, as illustrated through commented exploratory reports. At the end, the ISIS-Fish database is accompanied by a simulation and a technical validation report, which demonstrate the efficacy of the modelling process as parameterized. The data project includes 1) the ISIS-Fish database and all the ISIS-Fish files required to re-run the simulation of the 7 populations dynamics, 2) the species sheets for megrim, cuckoo ray, thornback ray, anglerfish and sole and 3) the R scripts to reproduce maps of the 5 species. All the data are reproductible using isis-fish-4.4.8.1 (isis-fish.org) and R 4.3.2. WARNING : Due to excessively long file paths, decompression may fail on Windows. To prevent this, please extract the archive directly to a root folder (e.g., C:\).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSEANOESame topicSocial and Demographic Issues in GermanyFrench-language works237,207