MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925830072 · doi:10.20381/ruor-7704

Marital distress and depressive symptoms in women: The effects of self-silencing and self-complexity.

2001· article· en· W6925830072 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Communication and Language
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepressive symptomsContext (archaeology)Depression (economics)DistressFeelingVulnerability (computing)Beck Depression InventoryModeration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marital distress and depression are strongly related, making the study of depression within a marital context particularly interesting. Causal models suggest that men's depressive symptoms precede marital dissatisfaction, whereas women's depressive symptomatology follows marital dissatisfaction. Few such models have integrated husbands' and wives' variables in a single model. The present study tested a model that predicted depressive symptoms in married women using marital dissatisfaction, self-silencing, and husbands' depressive symptoms. Jack's (1991) theory predicted that self-silencing would be more likely to occur in women for whom the marital role was central to the self-concept. A community sample of eighty-five couples completed the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale. A measure self-image complexity was included to determine the extent to which subjects defined themselves in terms of their marital relationships. A "domino effect" was supported in predicting women's, but not men's, depressive symptoms: depressed husbands tended to be dissatisfied with their marriages, which increased the likelihood that their wives would also be dissatisfied, which was related to the women's vulnerability to depressive symptoms. Silencing one's needs and feelings within relationships was also associated with an increase in women's depressive symptoms, and was particularly likely to occur when the husbands reported depressive symptoms. Contrary to Jack's (1991) self-silencing theory, silencing was less likely to occur in women who defined themselves in terms of their marital relationships. This finding is in agreement with research examining relationships between conflict management techniques and particular attachment styles. Individuals who are preoccupied with their relationships, who are likely to define themselves in terms of those relationships, tend not to silence their needs and feelings. In contrast, individuals who avoid closeness in relationships, who are unlikely to define themselves in relationship terms, tend to withdraw from conflict and censor their feelings in interactions with their partners. Further research is needed in order to clarify the association between the centrality of relationships to one's sense of self and the silencing of needs and feelings within those relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.144
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicDigital Communication and LanguageFrench-language works237,207