MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6926037597 · doi:10.18739/a20r9m596

Dissolved greenhouse gas measurements in Cambridge Bay, Nunavut, Canada (June/July 2022, June/July 2023)

2025· dataset· en· W6926037597 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCalifornia Digital Library · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Politics and Representation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouse gasBayMethaneArcticPermafrostCarbon dioxideHydrology (agriculture)Spring (device)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dissolved methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) were measured in Cambridge Bay, Nunavut, Canada in ponds and a lake-river-bay continuum during two field seasons in June-July 2022 and June-July 2023. Cambridge Bay experiences a seasonal freeze-thaw cycle; During the winter frozen season, methane and carbon dioxide, naturally released from biological decay and permafrost heaving, become trapped in water bodies under ice. During the spring thaw, questions remain regarding the dynamics and fate of these gases including whether they are ventilated, consumed, or transported. We present a two-year study measuring dissolved greenhouse gas concentrations in the Canadian High Arctic at the Greiner Lake Watershed in Cambridge Bay (Iqaluktuuttiaq), Nunavut during the 2022 and 2023 spring thaws. Measurements of dissolved CH4, CO2, temperature, and salinity were made along a lake-river-bay continuum, including local ponds, using a suite of in situ sensors. CH4 and CO2 were measured using a Los Gatos Research (LGR) dissolved gas extraction unit (DGEU) coupled to a LGR greenhouse gas analyzer (GGA). Instruments were deployed shoreside and with the ChemYak, a remotely operated robotic kayak developed by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI). This study represents how key technologies, sensors, and targeted sampling campaigns could be established to help us predict future greenhouse gas dynamics in changing Arctic systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.320
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCalifornia Digital LibrarySame topicGender Politics and RepresentationFrench-language works237,207