MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6926380183 · doi:10.18739/a2p55dj61

Transect-based ice thickness, snow depth, and surface elevation data collected on the Yukon and Tanana rivers in Alaska during the late winter 2024

2024· dataset· en· W6926380183 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUC Santa Barbara · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransectSnowElevation (ballistics)Arctic ice packDigital elevation modelSea iceCryosphere

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of the Fresh Eyes on Ice project (https://fresheyesonice.org/), we traveled between the communities of Galena and Fairbanks Alaska during March of 2024 collected field data at 24 river locations and one lake location to document late winter ice and snow conditions. The majority of locations were selected based on satellite-observed ice conditions during freeze-up (October - December 2023) to represent transitions in ice formation timing and process. All data was collected along linear transects ranging from approximately 100 to greater than 1000-meter (m) length typically arrayed across freeze-up transitions zones using a combination of ice drilling at three to five points along each transect, high-frequency ice penetrating radar (500 millihertz (mHz) antennae), evenly spaced snow depth measurements using a magna probe, and unpersonned aerial vehicle (UAS) structure-for-motion photographs to construct relative surface elevation models. Ice thickness, snow depth, and relative surface elevation data were summarized to 10-m intervals along these transects. Specifically, these data are intended to aid understanding of how river freeze-up conditions are expressed in late winter at a resolution comparable to many field studies and remotely sensed data acquisition types. Several locations were selected with input from the communities of Galena, Tanana, and Rampart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUC Santa BarbaraSame topicMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisFrench-language works237,207