MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6926460745 · doi:10.24406/publica-4350

Forschungsdatenmanagement in der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft

2024· other· de· W6926460745 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) · 2024
Typeother
Languagede
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData collectionTerm (time)Quarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dieser Vortrag stellt die Aktivitäten im Bereich Forschungsdatenmanagement dar, die innerhalb der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft stattgefunden haben. Zunächst werden die Rahmenbedingungen für die Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft skizziert. Anschließend werden die Aktivitäten dargestellt: das Fraunhofer-Repositorium Fordatis, das Projekt KResCo, Data Governance für Forschungsdaten , Fraunhofer in der Nationalen Forschungsdateninfrastruktur, im Projekt FAIR DATA Spaces. In Forschungsdaten steckt, besonders im Hinblick auf KI für Fraunhofer viel Potenzial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0080.008
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.003
Bibliometrics0.0160.018
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0300.037
Open science0.0340.027
Research integrity0.0060.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.173

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft)Same topicResearch Data Management PracticesFrench-language works237,207