MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6926897704 · doi:10.25607/obp-1698

Inuit Priorities for Canada’s Climate Strategy: A Canadian Inuit Vision for Our Common Future in Our Homelands.

2016· report· en· W6926897704 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIOC of UNESCO (Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission) · 2016
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)General partnershipPovertyClimate changeHomelandFace (sociological concept)Settlement (finance)Limiting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report provides First Ministers and Canadian stakeholders with an overview of the diverse and growing needs Canadian Inuit face as we adapt to climate change in Inuit Nunangat, the Inuit homeland spanning four jurisdictions (the Inuvialuit Settlement Region in the Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Nunavik in Québec, and Nunatsiavut in northern Labrador) that together encompass 50 percent of Canada’s coastline and 35 percent of its landmass. It outlines our expectations for working in partnership with the Government of Canada to avoid a one size fits all approach to meeting the commitment Canada made in Paris, France in 2015 to transition to a low-carbon economy. This transition must be just and equitable for Inuit. Climate actions must be considered handin- glove with their links to troubling socio-economic inequities faced by Inuit. Not only are we experiencing the frontline impacts of climate change but we are also highly vulnerable to decisions that do not take into account the unique ways in which Inuit are affected by climate change. The social inequities Inuit face tend to be magnitudes larger than those faced by people in most other parts of Canada. These inequities contribute to the marginalization of too many Inuit households through limited access to education, employment, quality housing, and adequate and nutritious food.1 Poverty in turn weighs on mental well-being, limiting the ability of individuals to fully participate in society. The cost-of-living is very high in our communities and the provision of heating, electricity, and almost every other necessity is dependent on carbon-intensive activities. These factors, combined with the reality that the majority of our households are low-income, prevent many of our families from investing in activities such as education, quality foods, and childcare that most Canadians take for granted.2 Too many Inuit households find the expense of buying and maintaining the equipment needed to engage in the traditional harvesting activities that provide social, cultural, and economic sustenance to families beyond their reach. Loss and damage due to climate impacts can place an additional financial strain on households along with the challenge of staying safe in increasingly unpredictable conditions. The environment of risk that Inuit are born into is intensified by climate change. This report will outline how targeted actions taken in full partnership with Inuit can relieve these factors, and also describes the opportunity to address the inequities Inuit face while meeting Canada’s commitment to transition to a low-carbon economy. Our long term expectations for climate action include the following goals: • Sustained resources for capacity-building and coordination that ensure Inuit are equal partners in long-term Federal, Provincial and Territorial (FPT) climate action planning. • Arctic climate policies that integrate Inuit knowledge and ensure the diverse climate solutions needed in the North also lead to measureable improvements in our standard of living until the standard of living enjoyed by Inuit is on par with that enjoyed by Canadians as a whole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOC of UNESCO (Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission)French-language works237,207