Inuit Priorities for Canada’s Climate Strategy: A Canadian Inuit Vision for Our Common Future in Our Homelands.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report provides First Ministers and Canadian stakeholders with an overview of the diverse and growing needs Canadian Inuit face as we adapt to climate change in Inuit Nunangat, the Inuit homeland spanning four jurisdictions (the Inuvialuit Settlement Region in the Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Nunavik in Québec, and Nunatsiavut in northern Labrador) that together encompass 50 percent of Canada’s coastline and 35 percent of its landmass. It outlines our expectations for working in partnership with the Government of Canada to avoid a one size fits all approach to meeting the commitment Canada made in Paris, France in 2015 to transition to a low-carbon economy. This transition must be just and equitable for Inuit. Climate actions must be considered handin- glove with their links to troubling socio-economic inequities faced by Inuit. Not only are we experiencing the frontline impacts of climate change but we are also highly vulnerable to decisions that do not take into account the unique ways in which Inuit are affected by climate change. The social inequities Inuit face tend to be magnitudes larger than those faced by people in most other parts of Canada. These inequities contribute to the marginalization of too many Inuit households through limited access to education, employment, quality housing, and adequate and nutritious food.1 Poverty in turn weighs on mental well-being, limiting the ability of individuals to fully participate in society. The cost-of-living is very high in our communities and the provision of heating, electricity, and almost every other necessity is dependent on carbon-intensive activities. These factors, combined with the reality that the majority of our households are low-income, prevent many of our families from investing in activities such as education, quality foods, and childcare that most Canadians take for granted.2 Too many Inuit households find the expense of buying and maintaining the equipment needed to engage in the traditional harvesting activities that provide social, cultural, and economic sustenance to families beyond their reach. Loss and damage due to climate impacts can place an additional financial strain on households along with the challenge of staying safe in increasingly unpredictable conditions. The environment of risk that Inuit are born into is intensified by climate change. This report will outline how targeted actions taken in full partnership with Inuit can relieve these factors, and also describes the opportunity to address the inequities Inuit face while meeting Canada’s commitment to transition to a low-carbon economy. Our long term expectations for climate action include the following goals: • Sustained resources for capacity-building and coordination that ensure Inuit are equal partners in long-term Federal, Provincial and Territorial (FPT) climate action planning. • Arctic climate policies that integrate Inuit knowledge and ensure the diverse climate solutions needed in the North also lead to measureable improvements in our standard of living until the standard of living enjoyed by Inuit is on par with that enjoyed by Canadians as a whole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".