MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lance-Adams Syndrome : Functional Rehabilitation Via Multidisciplinary intervention

2017· other· en· W6927283449 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAction (physics)DiseaseNocebo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LANCE-ADAMS SYNDROME: FUNCTIONAL REHABILITATION VIA MULTIDISCIPLINARY INTERVENTIONDerek Thong*, Bonnie Buchko^, Rouaa Mandurah*, Flor Muniz-Rodriguez*^, Seyed-Hossein Hosseini*^, Gihan Perera*^, Zhihui (Joy) Deng*^*McMaster University Department of Medicine, Division of PMR, Hamilton, Canada, ^Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, CanadaLance-Adams syndrome (LAS), a chronic form of post-hypoxic myoclonus, is a rare complication developed days or weeks after a successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The characteristic features of this condition are action and reflex myoclonus that subside at rest. The myoclonus can produce marked functional disability and it especially interferes with gait, which can be bouncy and unsteady, resulting in falls and close-calls. The pathophysiology of LAS is not clear. The imaging studies of LAS patients indicated a heterogeneous mechanism with the involvement of cortical-subcortical structures, brainstem, and/or cerebellum. The current literature suggests that the most effective agents - levetiracetam, piracetam, clonazepam, and valproic acid - produce the best outcomes when used in any combination, except for levetiracetam and piracetam when used together. Despite there being approximately 150 case reports, there appears to be a paucity regarding functional outcomes after multidisciplinary treatment. In addition to myoclonus, most patients with LAS present with neurocognitive and communication impairments, which also impact the patientsu2019 functional ability.Our group at Hamilton Health Sciences represents a multidisciplinary team who specialize in the inpatient rehabilitation of acquired brain injury (ABI) and includes: physiatrists, neurologists, physiotherapists, pharmacists, psychiatrists, neuropsychologists, nurses, occupational therapists, speech language pathologists, therapeutic recreationists, social workers, and registered dieticians. We present three cases of LAS admitted between 2015 and 2018 that received multidisciplinary assessment and therapy at our ABI rehabilitation program. These patients were treated with a variety of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions.The multidisciplinary approach appears to result in marked functional gains for the three patients affected by LAS leading to an increase in independence and quality of life. The physical therapy and occupational therapy strategies seem to dictate the rate of functional progress while medications are responsible for the control of myoclonus per se. However, the patient's ability and willingness to participate in therapy and trialling medications is the main determinant of functional change at discharge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0280.012
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.030
Open science0.0100.015
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library)French-language works237,207