MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6927972865 · doi:10.34945/f5m01j

Treating a C5 contusion injury in female rats with sigmoid protein and 4-methylumbelliferone in combination with single pellet grasping training

2024· dataset· en· W6927972865 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUC San Diego · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalineSigmoid functionSpinal cord injuryPelletRat modelSpinal cord

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY PURPOSE: We tested the effect of 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU), an inhibitor for hyaluronan (HA) synthesis and Intracellular Sigmoid Protein, a PTP sigma antagonist, in combination with single pellet grasping (SPG) training on neuroplasticity and functional recovery following cervical spinal cord injury in rats. DATA COLLECTED: All rats (n=30) were trained on single pellet grasping (SPG) using semi-automated dispensers. Paw preference was determined within the first week of training. After a plateau was reached in both single pellet reaching attempts and success rate, all rats received unilateral cervical spinal contusions (based on paw preference) at C5 using the Infinite Horizon impactor. Rats were assigned to 2 groups based on the severity of the lesion, as determined by the cylinder test on day 3 post SCI. Four rats were excluded (n=2 failed to learn SPG, n=1 no discernible deficit, n=1 euthanised due to health issues). The Control group (n=13) consisted of animals who received 1 ml saline (s.c.) daily and nutella twice/day for 5 days/week for a total of 8 weeks. The 4MU+ISP group (n=13) received 500µg intracellular sigmoid protein daily (s.c.) and a total of 0.5g/Kg 4 methylumbelliferone (MU), 5 days a week in nutella. Treatments started at week 18 post SCI and continued through week 25 post SCI, for 8 weeks in total. SPG training started 18 weeks post injury (5x/week for 10 min each) for twelve weeks. Every 2 weeks during the training/treatment the rats were tested on the horizontal ladder. The treatments were stopped after 8 weeks and the rats were tested with cylinder, elevated plus maze, Irvine, Beatties and Bresnahan (IBB) Forelimb Scale, Forelimb Locomotor Score (FLS) and horizontal ladder tests. AAV9 tracering was administered bilaterally into the forelimb motor cortex to trace lesioned and unlesioned corticospinal tract (CST) tracts. The rats were euthanized 3 weeks after tracer injection. Livers were dissected and weighed, the brain and spinal cord cryoprotected for histologic examination. The spinal cord tissue damage was determined from GFAP immunostained serial horizontal section images by measuring the total area of damage. Analysis of collateral sprouting for both lesioned and unlesioned CST tracts, including the number of CST collaterals and the distance of collateral sprouting both rostral and caudal to the lesion from transverse sections. DATA USAGE NOTES:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUC San DiegoFrench-language works237,207